The Crusades

sknox

Member and remember
Joined
Mar 25, 2013
Messages
786
Location
Idaho
#3
The Third Crusade is now live
Third Crusade
This the best-known crusade besides the First. It's got Richard of England, the famous sultan Saladin, assassins and kidnapping and daring rescues. I have yet to read a good novelization of the events, but of course Runciman's recounting is pretty dramatic.

I'm just going to keep on the the crusading stuff for a while. There are the main crusades but I also have essays that trace each Crusader Kingdom individually, plus essays on things like the Albigensian Crusade, and even the fourteenth and fifteenth century crusades. At some point I'll add the Virtual Pilgrimage (whose title feels awfully dated now). So it's going to be some time before I get back to the more general European history stuff.
 

sknox

Member and remember
Joined
Mar 25, 2013
Messages
786
Location
Idaho
#5
Academic is exactly right; you say that like it was a bad thing. :)

I wasn't trying to dramatize. It would make a good subject for novelization, but fiction writers always seem to go for the First or the Third.
 

RJM Corbet

Deus Pascus Corvus
Joined
Mar 25, 2011
Messages
2,576
Location
Devon UK
#6
Academic is exactly right; you say that like it was a bad thing. :)

I wasn't trying to dramatize. It would make a good subject for novelization, but fiction writers always seem to go for the First or the Third.
Oh no, I didn't mean it as a bad thing. Just academic. I'm working my way through my brother's 348 page Art PhD thesis. So I do academic as well as fiction, lol :)

EDIT: Your 2nd Crusade essay is well written and clear and avoids obscure words and terms. I learned a lot from it and I look forward to Richard, Saladin etc, in your new essay.
 
Last edited:

sknox

Member and remember
Joined
Mar 25, 2013
Messages
786
Location
Idaho
#8
Another installment in my continuing series of historical essays. This one is on the Fourth Crusade, one of the strangest, most complex (you'll note I did not say Byzantine), and most widely condemned of all the crusades.
Fourth Crusade, home

And here is a link to the table of contents for all the other articles
History by Ellis L. Knox

Let me know what you think, and feel free to ask questions!
 

thaddeus6th

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
6,293
Location
UK, Yorkshire
#9
Don't have the time to check it out now, but will be reading it with interest.

The Fourth Crusade is arguably the most stupid 'Western' foreign policy mistake in history. Kudos to Enrico Dandolo for his persuasive power (and vigour, given he was a blind ninetysomething), but the long term consequences were less than great from a European/Christian perspective.
 

thaddeus6th

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
6,293
Location
UK, Yorkshire
#11
Totally ended any realistic hope of the Eastern Empire surviving (let alone prospering) against the Ottoman Turks. To be fair, a few more generations of Angeli misrule may've achieved the same, but the Catholic/Orthodox schism, Latin/Greek suspicion, and the ensuing Fourth Crusade was a godsend (ahem) for the Turks. Not that they were going backwards anyway, but it certainly helped.
 

sknox

Member and remember
Joined
Mar 25, 2013
Messages
786
Location
Idaho
#12
A new article on the crusades is now live. This one is on the Fifth Crusade,
Fifth Crusade
Each crusade is a strange, complicated event in itself, so it's a bit redundant to say this one is strange and complicated. Perhaps its distinguishing characteristic is that it's the closest any of the crusades came to being led by the Church.

If you are interested in previous articles, here is a link to the table of contents.
History by Ellis L. Knox

Let me know what you think, and feel free to ask questions!
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Phyrebrat Writing Discussion 32
M Historical Fiction 2
M Historical Fiction 21

Similar threads

Top