Personally, I like them. They're not as good as the OT, but they are enjoyable movies, none the less.
They're not excellent, but they are good.
I would challenge anyone who hasn't seen the prequels in a few years to summarize the plots of those films.
I'm sorry, what I meant by "plot summary" are the major points of action in a story, rather than theme or one line blurb.The Phantom Menace - Palpatine uses the Trade Federation to maneuver his way into political power.
Attack of the Clones - Palpatine further uses the conflict withy the Trade Federation to start work on getting the Senate to green light an army of clone troopers to fight the superior numbers of the Federation's droid army. Because the Senate is apparently full of morons, no-one questions why there happens to be a clone army ready for just when they need it.
Revenge of the Sith - Palpatine completes his gambit of declaring himself Emperor, all while grooming young Anakin to become his apprentice.
In all three, Jar Jar Binks sucked.
The second prequel I have only the most fragmentary remembrance of - when I went to see it in the cinema I actually nodded off halfway through. Doing so possibly improved the viewing.I'm sorry, what I meant by "plot summary" are the major points of action in a story, rather than theme or one line blurb.
And the point I was making was that the prequel's plots involve a series of events with so little narrative connection between then that it is hard to organize in our memories what actually happened during the films. The first movie had droid armies, a motor race, Natalie Portman in a chromed SR-71, the death of Liam Nieson, a man with a red face and a child accidentally shooting down a space station. It is barely narrative, but more like the EPCOT ride. Despite having seen the film, I can't put the events together or remember how the characters progressed.
+1. I think there was a submarine ride through the center of some planet - not sure which one.The second prequel I have only the most fragmentary remembrance of - when I went to see it in the cinema I actually nodded off halfway through. Doing so possibly improved the viewing.
However I've got a soft spot for Revenge of the Sith. I'd argue, that at the very least it feels like a prequel to Star wars.
Ahhhh... the world is right again! Star Wars fans bitching and moaning about Star Wars!
Thank you, gentleman! I have my equilibrium back!
There were some really good SF movies during that time period.I thought they were watchable and slightly better than the average sci-fi flick at the time. BUT and it's a big but they were not up to the quality (adjusted for inflation) of first 3.
Both the little and big Anakin pretty much sucked. Jar Jar and his plotline and his people sucked. Only there to make children squeal and buy toys.
Don't even get me started on midi chlorians. Good thing I'm more Trek than Wars or they would have really offended me.
There were some really good SF movies during that time period.
|Thread starter||Similar threads||Forum||Replies||Date|
|Star Wars The Phantom Menace Novelization VS Film||Writing Discussion||1|
|C||Would it be possible to make a TV show set in space that is not Star Wars or Star Trek that would be a hit with the mainstream?||SFF Lounge||56|
|Star Wars highlights explained in Infographics||Star Wars||2|
|Could the Star Wars prequels have ever been accepted?||Star Wars||33|
|M||A new version of the Star Wars prequels||Critiques||1|