The Gap Cycle by Stephen R. Donaldson

Southern Geologist

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2012
Messages
286
[Please note that this is a review of a series of books rather than any individual book within the series.]

Stephen R. Donaldson is primarily known for the dark fantasy work The Chronicles of Thomas Covenant, which kicked off his career. The Gap Cycle, however, is a space opera. The sub-genre space opera is a form of science fiction traditionally characterized by a focus on grand adventure, melodramatic romance, a war of good versus evil, and characters rather than technology. The setting of outer space tends to be used merely as a backdrop for the action. The Gap Cycle is a space opera in a more literal sense, too: The last four books in the series were inspired by Wagner's Ring Cycle.

I should note at this point that the Gap Cycle is a subversive work which viciously tears apart the conventions of formulaic space opera. Technology, while taking a back seat to the characters, is present as more than just a backdrop and the author makes an attempt at a level of realism that goes beyond traditional space opera. Grand adventure is replaced by the simple and brutal reality of the difficulty of survival while engaging in interstellar travel and the dangers and widespread influence of politics even on distant regions of space. The characters, too, are complex. There is no black and white morality. The author stated that his intent with the first book in the series "The Real Story" was to display the shifting roles of victim, victimizer and rescuer, and this theme is pervasive throughout. There is no galaxy-wide battle featuring mankind taking on the evil forces of invading aliens--aliens are present and do have a distaste for mankind but their method of warfare is much more insidious than simply sending ships out to blast stuff--humankind are fragmented and in perpetual conflict, both as a result of human nature and of political conflicts.

The series starts slowly with a focus on three main characters, all of whom are fighting for survival--physiological and psychological--in their own (sometimes despicable) ways, but slowly expands its scope to reveal a much bigger picture. About half-way through the second one book will see that these people are pawns in a much larger political conflict that is revealed in full later in the series.

Donaldson thrives at subverting genre conventions but his greatest strength is in characterization. Of the three starting characters and only one should be the least bit sympathetic. One is nothing short of monstrous and another lies somewhere in the middle, but he is no saint either. And yet these characters--and those that come later--are fascinating. Third person limited viewpoint is used throughout the series with the viewpoint switching from character to character in alternating chapters. The author uses this technique magnificently to peel away layers of lies and distrust and let you peer inside the mind of the main characters and find out who they really are and--more importantly--why. Much like real life, hardly anyone is evil just for the sake of being evil, or good merely for the sake of goodness, they've all had experiences--good and bad--that make their thoughts and actions inevitable and you will find out why.

Another of the author's great strengths is in writing action scenes. He generates intelligently written, tense action scenes with a level of skill that most writers couldn't dream of achieving. His work had me flipping pages like a mad man, staring intensely at the text, terrified of what would happen next--would these people survive?--but needing to find out in spite of myself and and needing to find out immediately. I must acknowledge that his skill at pacing assists in making the action scenes so engaging. He knows how to slowly build the story to a climax and feed you just enough details to let you know what might be coming next, but not enough to know how it will play out. You're left wondering if this chase or that plan will work out, if any of your favorite characters will die and, if so, who. That his writing generates this dilemma seems quite appropriate given that Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is used as an analogy for our inability to determine the outcome of human behavior throughout the series. The books are also structured well; they get progressively longer as the series continues but at no point did I feel lost or that there was fat that needed to be cut.

Be warned, though, Donaldson is not one to pull punches. Many people have difficulty getting through the first book in the series--the prelude--because of the violence and sadism contained within that short volume. Out of darkness comes light, but the series is gritty and a reader will be lost in darkness for a while before they get a glimpse of light.

This series is one of the finest pieces of fiction I've ever had the joy of reading and comes highly recommended, but it is not for the weak of heart or stomach.
 
I think this is a very fair and honest review. I've come across a few people who failed to get past The Real Story but, if you do make the step beyond, the rewards are great. :)
 
Thank you for the compliment. I've noticed that people have trouble getting past The Real Story and (probably should have mentioned this in my review but forgot) I think that's partially because of the sexual violence in that one and partially because it's the weakest book in the series. I think Donaldson made a smart move when he asked the publisher to combine The Real Story and Forbidden Knowledge into one volume for the latest reprint.
 
I don't think "The Real Story" is the weakest in the series but it is the only one that can stand alone. In a way, it's almost an extended prologue for the rest of the series, and yet it is more than that. I think that Donaldson was setting up the most repugnant, repulsive and unlike-able character he could (Angus Thermapyle) with the intention of transforming the reader's perception of him by the end of the series. At the end you will find yourself cheering him on despite despising at the beginning.
 
I think that Donaldson was setting up the most repugnant, repulsive and unlike-able character he could (Angus Thermapyle) with the intention of transforming the reader's perception of him by the end of the series. At the end you will find yourself cheering him on despite despising at the beginning.

I think you're spot on with that statement....and yes, I was cheering him on at the end:)
 
I don't think "The Real Story" is the weakest in the series but it is the only one that can stand alone. In a way, it's almost an extended prologue for the rest of the series, and yet it is more than that. I think that Donaldson was setting up the most repugnant, repulsive and unlike-able character he could (Angus Thermapyle) with the intention of transforming the reader's perception of him by the end of the series. At the end you will find yourself cheering him on despite despising at the beginning.

For what it's worth, I did enjoy The Real Story and did not find it to be a weak book in general, but I do stand by my statement that it's the weakest in the series simply because what it is stacked against is nothing short of magnificent in my eyes.

I think you're largely right about his goal with Angus, though I will note that Donaldson stated that he originally intended the work as a stand-alone novella to demonstrate a reversal of the roles of victimizer, victim, and rescuer but gave up on it for several years because he could never make the work match his standards for being publishable until he came up with the idea of using it as a prelude to a series. That said, it is entirely possible that he re-wrote Angus to be even more of a ******* once the idea of using it as part of a series came to him.:p
 

Back
Top