does anyone else abhore abortions (which I consider murder of life, if highly dependent, it's still alive) and feotal stem cell research?
really, the cells are possibly cancerous (and with cancer popping up more frequently, there's more chance of it happening) and you must kill a completely helpless organism (where's PETA? humans are animals, too) to 'harvest' the cells
conversely, adult stem cells are proven to be cancerous or not by the progress of their owner through life. They are, I think, of slightly less availability the Feotal cells, but if a mother puts her baby's umbilica and placenta in cold storage, those cells could be used on the baby if it develops anything harmful later in life or if the child grows into adulthood, they can donate their stem cells to science for the progression of mankind.
yeah, it sounds righteous, and there is the 'choice' 'debate' but I biliev that the choice is whether or not the mother of the child has sex (protected or not), if they take the risk, and they knowingly take it, if pregnancy should be the outcome, you must suffer throught it, no matter how bad you don't want a child or are too young, the only time an abortion should be performed is if the baby will most likely endanger the life of a young mother or if both person's lives are forfeit if the birth happens.
One's potential should never be sacrificed for another's comfort.
