Yes, Fall of the Roman Empire does some things better - but both films also completely miss the historical accounts of the period and Commodus, in particular, who is written of as a someone who frequently found in the Gladitorial arena, thught he was Hercules, and loved the company of other men. Both films covering that emperor completely miss out on the historical element, which is a shame.
As for the film itself - funny, I really didn't like it when I first saw it at the cinema - I demanded an epic that it simply did not deliver.
However, some bad filming elements aside, I'm such a Romanophile that I simply had to warm to it on video. Not a great film but a good film - but far too over-hyped.
I am so waiting patiently for a proper re-visitation of the real 60's epics, though - and if no one brings any forward, I've always loved the idea of penning a film script for Alexander the Great or the Fall of Constantinople (1453).
I just hope the Gladiator hype made the movie makers look to epics of the ancient world - maybe we'll see the fruits of that finally over the next two years or so.
I probably will buy Fall of the Roman Empire first, though, as I don;t have a copy of that at all.