The part you get rid fits on a truck and has no fluids. Why is that a problem?It is only practical if it is used for decentralized remote locations otherwise getting rid of the nuclear waste becomes impractical. Might be okay for space exploration but the weight is 35 tons which is to much for one rocket to carry. Getting rid of the unit after 8 years would still be a problem.
You could store quite a bit of fission waste and have no real impact on the environment.The only way forward with power plants is the use of infinite resources such as water, wind and the Sun.
Anything else is just creating more and more problems for future generations. The main issue is not the size or power of these devices, but what you do and where you store them once they have expired.
The only way forward with power plants is the use of infinite resources such as water, wind and the Sun.
Our actions are causing the crust and the atmosphere to warm up. That's extra energy that wasn't there yesterday. If we aren't going to quit adding energy than we might as well make use of it.Every time the wind turns a turbine, it is transferring energy.
Just watch these 2 guys for a minute, one of them genuinely thinks the wind turbines are there for global warming - he thinks they are giant fans that are set up to cool down the planet!. Every time the wind turns a turbine, it is transferring energy. Put up enough, and you start affecting the wind.
Kind of amazing that athletes and people with Youtube channels aren't more familiar with science.Just watch these 2 guys for a minute, one of them genuinely thinks the wind turbines are there for global warming - he thinks they are giant fans that are set up to cool down the planet!