Well, I can only say I liked it very much, and would definitely buy it on the basis of the extract. It reminded me a little of a Regency Rivers of London, which is no bad thing, IMHO.
Doubtless my fault for not making it clearer, but she's not taking offence at the race/gender comments because they're talking race/gender as such, but because she's taking all that's said as personal insults, in the same way as if someone said her hands were too large or her ankles too thick (not that they can see her ankles). She's not being given the respect she's due.The race gender offence taken seems anachronistic.
I don't imagine a Catholic priest or Methodist minister would be incensed that others didn't share their particular version of Christianity, and there's even less reason for the Vestals to be annoyed, since they're only presenting as kind-of-Anglican-with-quirks. She is offended at the rector's comments, though, and the idea of the Sacred Grove being destroyed, and perhaps I ought to make more of that.The Vestal ought to be more incensed with the disbelief or similar than incredibly normal racial commentary.
Yes, I know, but the insect imagery fitted with her character and thoughts, and I don't suppose many people would take issue at the men and women being described as different insects, nor at Wilson being described as a hornet, another insect altogether. "Drone" also fits as a dull noise, ie the men's boring voices.I found the use of drones and wasps distracting. Drones are male bees, wasps are all wasps. They don't fit together obviously.
Frankly, if someone voluntarily reading a fantasy book based in Georgian England first thinks of a radio-controlled aircraft when reading "drone" then I might as well give up now! At times I'll necessarily be using words that reflect the time and place which may not always accord with how they're used today, so I'll just have to hope for readers who either understand the period or are willing to discover new meanings!Plus, drone is now commonly something else.
You use "drone"for both an animal and noise, which causes the reader to have to do a quick thesaurus in their minds which puts them on other tracks. In a given passage, I would use one or the other rather than both to keep the animal alusion clear.Thanks!
Doubtless my fault for not making it clearer, but she's not taking offence at the race/gender comments because they're talking race/gender as such, but because she's taking all that's said as personal insults, in the same way as if someone said her hands were too large or her ankles too thick (not that they can see her ankles). She's not being given the respect she's due.
I don't imagine a Catholic priest or Methodist minister would be incensed that others didn't share their particular version of Christianity, and there's even less reason for the Vestals to be annoyed, since they're only presenting as kind-of-Anglican-with-quirks. She is offended at the rector's comments, though, and the idea of the Sacred Grove being destroyed, and perhaps I ought to make more of that.
Yes, I know, but the insect imagery fitted with her character and thoughts, and I don't suppose many people would take issue at the men and women being described as different insects, nor at Wilson being described as a hornet, another insect altogether. "Drone" also fits as a dull noise, ie the men's boring voices.
Frankly, if someone voluntarily reading a fantasy book based in Georgian England first thinks of a radio-controlled aircraft when reading "drone" then I might as well give up now! At times I'll necessarily be using words that reflect the time and place which may not always accord with how they're used today, so I'll just have to hope for readers who either understand the period or are willing to discover new meanings!
It makes the action not seem "period". Same as if the characters had a preoccupation with "world peace" or "workers' rights".
I'm not some anti-woke moron, and I doubt Toby is either
Thoughts on the Education of Daughters is published in 1787, with A Vindication of the Rights of Women following in 1892, so though "feminism" isn't a word in the C18th, there are certainly people who are actively considering the role of women in sociery and their rights at this time, even if nothing seems to happen for some considerable time.... feminism isn't quite in it yet (although Mary Wollstonecraft must be around back then). Perhaps the rights of women would be lumped in with "weird stuff religious dissenters/the French do" in the popular imagination, or something like that.
who knows what my Vestals may have been stirring up...
I still remember the excitement of watching the rock-hard little strips of dried flat noodles expand hugely and fill with tasty crunchyness when dropped into hot fat.A bit OT, but the (unintended, I hope) image that jumped to my mind here was a cauldron of Vesta chow mein. On a bit of a nostalgia trip, I then googled the product, assuming it had disappeared with the 1970s -- only to find they're still selling it!
I know! The magical entrancement was like finding Father Christmas had been. Thinking about it, it was probably a (vain) attempt to recapture that sense of awe and wonder that got me into fantasy.I still remember the excitement of watching the rock-hard little strips of dried flat noodles expand hugely and fill with tasty crunchyness when dropped into hot fat.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
V | Fantasy+pirates | Book Discussion | 12 | |
Old School Science Fantasy? | Book Discussion | 5 | ||
Fantasycon 2024 | Conventions and Events | 0 | ||
Georgian Fantasy Opening Chapter -- 1400 words | Critiques | 27 | ||
Georgian weapons | Writing Discussion | 11 |