ColGray
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2023
- Messages
- 355
Shakespeare wrote for money. And no one looks at King Lear and goes, What a sellout hack!
I'd also argue that genre = audience, but with the caveat that it's a rare book that captures 100% of the people who enjoy a given genre. Between audience size, language difference and various preferences, there will always be some people who shrug and say, not for me. And that's okay.
But it's hard to write anything that's original without knowing the genre-- we need to be our own audience, while also understanding what bits work, why they work and how we can subvert or re-interpret audience expectations.
Yes, this. A 1000x this. "Genre" isn't a dirty word -- it's a shorthand that sets audience expectations. I'm paraphrasing Shawn Coyne and his book on editing, StoryGrid, but, If you say, I've written a thriller, but fail to have reveals or a scene where the hero is in the clutches of the villain, the book doesn't work. The audience has certain expectations based on genre. The same is true for any genre -- lit fic, fantasy, SF, YA, etc. Genre is audience expectations and if you don't read the genre, you're not going to know the expectations.I would rather people knew their genre, rather than some imagined audience. It is amazing how often I see people interested in writing fantasy who don't ever read fantasy books!
I'd also argue that genre = audience, but with the caveat that it's a rare book that captures 100% of the people who enjoy a given genre. Between audience size, language difference and various preferences, there will always be some people who shrug and say, not for me. And that's okay.
But it's hard to write anything that's original without knowing the genre-- we need to be our own audience, while also understanding what bits work, why they work and how we can subvert or re-interpret audience expectations.