- Joined
- Jan 22, 2008
- Messages
- 8,000
1984 has an interesting variation on this: the official language, Newspeak, doesn't contain the word "free" in the sense of "able to do as you wish", with the expectation that, if the speakers don't have a word for it, they won't be able to want to be free. However, it's unclear how seriously the Party actually takes this, and whether they'd want citizens to forget the concept of freedom.
George MacDonald Fraser was in the British Empire's 14th Army, fighting alongside a range of African and Indian troops, and his British colleagues used a lot of foreign slang words with each other. I suppose there's a natural cycle to these things: Country A invades Country B; the people of B resist using the conquerors' language but, once the status quo changes, use A's words to rise in the new hierarchy and/or sound sophisticated; then an independence movement arises and rediscovers B's language (or a patois), using it very deliberately to reject the outsiders and strengthen its own identity.
George MacDonald Fraser was in the British Empire's 14th Army, fighting alongside a range of African and Indian troops, and his British colleagues used a lot of foreign slang words with each other. I suppose there's a natural cycle to these things: Country A invades Country B; the people of B resist using the conquerors' language but, once the status quo changes, use A's words to rise in the new hierarchy and/or sound sophisticated; then an independence movement arises and rediscovers B's language (or a patois), using it very deliberately to reject the outsiders and strengthen its own identity.
Last edited: