Another step forward for the surveillance state

Astro Pen

Write now.
Supporter
Joined
Jan 24, 2020
Messages
1,770
Location
Wales UK
They could, of course, just have someone drive around the town for a week and write a journeys report instead of spending millions.
"Not used for enforcement purposes" (yet)
Remember the old adage about government, "Two reasons for everything, the one given - and the real one."
Will they take them down after the "study"? Watch this space.
 

CupofJoe

Some medals you wear on your heart not your sleeve
Joined
Mar 29, 2019
Messages
1,331
They use ANPR at work to make us pay for parking.
I object to that, but it also records when you enter and leave the site. So someone knows if you are working late or slipping off a bit early.
On the other hand the system failed to work for the month of December so no-one had to pay.
 

Montero

Senior Member
Supporter
Joined
Jan 2, 2008
Messages
3,213
Location
Up the clum
Some people are already buying their own state surveillance in the form of those Alexa units and video doorbell - get you to pay for your own surveillance and to want it to protect yourself. If the govt had come round and said everyone must have a video doorbell there would have been a massive outcry.
 

BAYLOR

There Are Always new Things to Learn.
Joined
Jun 29, 2014
Messages
22,051
Some people are already buying their own state surveillance in the form of those Alexa units and video doorbell - get you to pay for your own surveillance and to want it to protect yourself. If the govt had come round and said everyone must have a video doorbell there would have been a massive outcry.

When you look at it long term, It's not a good thing at all. :(
 

thaddeus6th

Well-Known Member
Supporter
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
7,007
Location
UK, Yorkshire
This reminds me of a story I heard a couple of weeks ago that the police want the right to be able to access Oyster information to see if people are using the tube in London in an 'unusual' way. Apparently it's to try and detect thieves, pickpockets, etc, but it sounded creepy as hell to me.

Not a fan of Alexa or suchlike.
 

AllanR

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2021
Messages
565
Location
Canada
It's not even safe to .....https://mashable.com/article/smart-toilet-analprint-scan
 

elvet

Easily amused
Supporter
Joined
Feb 21, 2006
Messages
2,906
Location
Ontario, Canada
I always take these things for granted when I watch UK detective series. They usually provide a key piece of evidence in the story. It seeems their use is widespread in Britain.
 

sciwriterPark

Active Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2022
Messages
34
I moved to a more remote part of the US to avoid some of the monitoring. The road to the airport. No cell service, no radio signal, and you do what you gotta do when problems occur.
unnamed.jpg
 

LostCosmonaut

Active Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2022
Messages
43
Location
The Pacific Northwest
Some people are already buying their own state surveillance in the form of those Alexa units and video doorbell - get you to pay for your own surveillance and to want it to protect yourself. If the govt had come round and said everyone must have a video doorbell there would have been a massive outcry.
My parents have those Alexa screens installed in most rooms of their house. The darn things have exactly the same functionality as a telescreen---they can eavesdrop on conversations, they contain cameras to watch your movements, and they broadcast regime propaganda. The only difference is that Amazon doesn't surveil people quite as obviously as the Thought Police.

Judging by my conversations with friends, I'm not the only member of the young generation to be thoroughly disenchanted with the encroachment of Alexa and other "smart" devices. There's definitely such a thing as too plugged-in.
 

Montero

Senior Member
Supporter
Joined
Jan 2, 2008
Messages
3,213
Location
Up the clum
I always take these things for granted when I watch UK detective series. They usually provide a key piece of evidence in the story. It seeems their use is widespread in Britain.
There are certainly a lot of CCTV cameras around, who controls them varies between property owner, local council, motoring organisation and police and probably more (ETA in public transport and on the front of buses so they can catch people who drive in the bus lane). I'm not sure I'd recognise an Amazon doorbell if I saw one. However the police would have to do a door to door for quite a lot of the recordings - knock, knock, "I see you have a security camera that might cover the back lane, could we have a copy of what was recorded last night" etc. Rather different to the easily available online stuff. Some people have it recording to their own computer, others to private online storage.
There are also quite a lot of dashcams around in cars and police appeal for anyone driving past an accident to hand over a copy.
 

Top