Many times when I'm reading what a lot of people consider to be an absolute classic, I find it sadly wanting.
I'm glad I'm not alone in that club!
Many times when I'm reading what a lot of people consider to be an absolute classic, I find it sadly wanting.
here, to explain the part of the sword:Finished David Weber’s Flag In Exile and I’m going to have to give Honor Harrington a rest for a while. To be honest, I’m starting to find it all a bit twee and she’s just a bit too perfect. I know there’s a justification made in both cases but I found the bad guys dealing with their guilt in just a matter of seconds after the tragedy just too unbelievable. No personal nightmare to struggle with even if they believed it was all part of God’s plan? Another wordy justification for taking out an expert swordsman follows. This after her own limited practice simply wasn’t enough to be believable either (especially given her physical condition at the time).
I also find it strange also that she constantly saw herself as ugly (but we all know she’s actually beautiful just like the ugly duckling). Why is it most if not all heroines appear to be physically attractive? I think it would be far more interesting to chart the progress of a truly plain woman rising in a man’s world.
Now starting a book on the Boer War.
If the Parson found Master and Commander over-wordy, I doubt he'll find Moby Dick an improvement...if you want a classic and sea together why not try moby dick? as for classics inn general, if the subject matter is away outside of our experience it may be more difficult to establish a connection. Besides that there's also the matter of some styles of writing.
But a skilled proponent has got to that stage by fighting many people that are also skillful, with much experience and practice of their own. Isn't it a possibility that fighting an unskilled opponent is extremely dangerous, simply because you both have no idea whatsoever what they were going to do?I can fully accept the idea of mentally overcoming your opponent but I can't accept that, when it ultimately comes to blows, the least skillful with a blade is suddenly the most skillful with little or no training.
I used to fence but was never any good at it. Trust me a good fencer could, and did on many occasions, take me out within seconds. I was only 17 at the time and it was always a good way making a cocky little brat like me who was starting to think how good he was realise just how bad he really was! I don't think I ever once got a hit on the best guy in our club!But a skilled proponent has got to that stage by fighting many people that are also skillful, with much experience and practice of their own. Isn't it a possibility that fighting an unskilled opponent is extremely dangerous, simply because you both have no idea whatsoever what they were going to do?
Indiana Jones used the best solutionI can fully accept the idea of mentally overcoming your opponent but I can't accept that, when it ultimately comes to blows, the least skillful with a blade is suddenly the most skillful with little or no training.
Isn't it a possibility that fighting an unskilled opponent is extremely dangerous, simply because you both have no idea whatsoever what they were going to do?
two different ways of writing, two different themes, more intensity in moby dick... do i need to go on?If the Parson found Master and Commander over-wordy, I doubt he'll find Moby Dick an improvement...
you missed the point,I can fully accept the idea of mentally overcoming your opponent but I can't accept that, when it ultimately comes to blows, the least skillful with a blade is suddenly the most skillful with little or no training.
I also find it strange also that she constantly saw herself as ugly (but we all know she’s actually beautiful just like the ugly duckling). Why is it most if not all heroines appear to be physically attractive? I think it would be far more interesting to chart the progress of a truly plain woman rising in a man’s world.
if you want a classic and sea together why not try moby dick? as for classics inn general, if the subject matter is away outside of our experience it may be more difficult to establish a connection. Besides that there's also the matter of some styles of writing.
Another wordy justification for taking out an expert swordsman follows. This after her own limited practice simply wasn’t enough to be believable either (especially given her physical condition at the time).
I also find it strange also that she constantly saw herself as ugly (but we all know she’s actually beautiful just like the ugly duckling).
I am not a swordsman but I know from my own experience that when a person practices a craft continuously, there is a point where muscle memory takes over. I don't believe one of the best on the planet would just stand there whilst his lesser skilled opponent took two expert swipes without reply. Even if his mind didn't react, his body would automatically attempt a defensive parry simply through muscle memory. It might not be successful but I don't accept that he would just stand there against an opponent already badly hurt before the duel even begins.But a skilled proponent has got to that stage by fighting many people that are also skillful, with much experience and practice of their own. Isn't it a possibility that fighting an unskilled opponent is extremely dangerous, simply because you both have no idea whatsoever what they were going to do?
I agree. But in Weber's world of Grayson, men and women are not equal - which is why I said in a man's world.I'd rather read about women without their beauty (or lack thereof) being of any particular importance, in a world where men and women are equal.
Is there a sword gene? Being given greater reflexes and strength does not necessarily mean skill in a certain craft.you missed the point,
1 - in accordance to the story honor was prepared to die. fully. her opponnent was a master but fully convinced of his one reason and wanted to live.
2 - honor is a genie, meaning, in weber's world she is genetically modified with greater reflexes and strengh
I'm not too sure about this now I've started it.This morning's read:-
Cage of Souls by Adrian Tchaikovsky
It was a bit of an odd one that and took me a while to get into and even then I was a little ambivalent. Not my favourite of his; it didn't seem to know whether it wanted to be SF or fantasy.DNF Cage of Souls, it really didn't suit my reading tastes.
Now I'm having a go at Rabbit Hole by Joe Richter
They're like a sausage in batter aren't they?some of his soliquoys