I got enough Cs to take my A’Levels and then wasted two years, failed my A’s, resat and ended up with a C, D, E.
Hence why I was 38 when I went to uni
I’ve often wondered how society would look if education catered more to learning styles and the individual rather than the current one-size-fits-all approach. As an adult I’m motivated and happiest when learning - as a kid I wanted to sit on the lake or river bank. (Part of the reason why it’s so hard for me to not write about river, lakes, the sea in pretty much everything that leaks from my addled mind.
I have an English degree that's about a third creative writing based (did a creative writing dissertation) and a Masters in creative writing (mainly because during my dissertation I suddenly realised script writing is great and I want to learn more about that) but since then I've basically given up the writing and use them only in a work-based capacity.
I'm a technician. Everybody knows we're incapable of fitting two sentences together, or making one sentence comprehensible to non-cognicenti - just look at the instruction manual for any high-tech gadget. And as well as being monumentally incomprehensible, I had no language skills at all, in my own or anybody else's. So my destiny was clear the prophecy graved into the university stonework. A hopeless case.
Except I had a father who taught English, used polysyllabic words in most conversations, Wrote bad poetry and parodies of well-known songs and was a pedant. Genetics running nearly true, I am an indifferent pedagogue, but the rest ran true, even to the point of me moving to a non-english-speaking country for more than half of my adult life and learning to think in other languages.
Which leaves me incomprehensible and garrulous, but very grammatically so, with a strong knowledge of my characters' speech patterns (I can generally hear them dictating the dialogue while I write it down (hmm, hearing voices, eh?), while, like the antepreceding poster, being totally incapable of selling anything.
But I don't believe formal education would have changed and of this. My clever sister, the poet, taught creative writing for a while, and read some of my dragon tales, but knew me well enough not to attempt to convert them to something conventional. So yes, apart from being a heavy and rapid reader, I can be considered largely autodidactic.
My degrees are in music composition and I've written tons of music, so I've got lots of experience with the creative process and reflective practice. The move to fiction is recent and it's been a learning process, with some things carrying over from music and other things completely new. And like Corey Swanson, I think a marketing degree would've been the most useful (for both music and fiction). Don't think I could summon the willpower to sit through that, though.
English degree over here (with one creative writing module), plus a few years in publishing (marketing side), and my first career was in public relations where I was constantly writing copy, press releases etc. Worked as a freelance journalist and editor (for magazines etc) for a while. Basically spent pretty much all my higher education and professional life writing a lot and having to develop a sharp, direct, and engaging style (that's what good copy is all about).
So I sharpened my writing skills via my day jobs/careers. You might call it "on-the-job training" and that, I've found, works much better for me than attending formal creative writing classes.
Took me many years but I finally started writing fiction about 3 - 4 years ago. The writing skills I polished over more than a decade stood me in good stead in terms of finally enabling me to write out my stories and give life to my storyverse and characters that were percolating inside me.
Experience always trumps education. The more you write and read, the better you will get. A formal qualification can teach you spelling, punctuation and correct grammar, but there is much more to writing than how to correctly spell words... I don't believe any qualification can make somebody a good author who wasn't already instinctively capable of being so.
My experience is I don't really learn anything from formal training that I don't already know or couldn't learn in my own time. It just provided me with the opportunity to practice skills I already had. But I could practice those skills without paying thousands of dollars in my own time, hence why I created an account on this forum. Much more useful than going to a writing school.
Read bazillions of books (fiction) from a young age and started writing then also. When I was older I read various 'How to' books - a lot of those over the years though only about self-publishing in more recent years. Once I started earning, I paid for a couple of evening classes before they cut creative writing from the syllabus, and did a distance learning course run by Strathclyde Uni. Plus went to writers' courses, conferences and a couple of retreats. Was in a couple of writers' groups for some years and have given and received a lot of face to face crit. Now in an Orbiter, which has gone a bit by the wayside while I was trying to finish the book I've just self-published but I will get back to that now. These days I don't bother with the books/courses and the rest of it. The parts that helped the most was having the opportunity to hear/read other people's material and having feedback on my own.
Once there was an elephant,
Who tried to use the telephant—
No! No! I mean an elephone
Who tried to use the telephone—
(Dear me! I am not certain quite
That even now I’ve got it right.)
Howe’er it was, he got his trunk
Entangled in the telephunk;
The more he tried to get it free,
The louder buzzed the telephee—
(I fear I’d better drop the song
Of elephop and telephong!)
Kidding. I have a double bachelor's in history/political science. My highest level of English was 200's, and none of it was for creative writing. To an extent, it has helped with the technical aspects of writing. But as far as the creative end, it's not a good background for sci/fi.
Until 3 years ago, most of my writings were more of an observational or documentary slant than speculative, although, polysci's great for helping build a governmental system for a fantasy setting, and historiography's come in surprisingly handy when it comes to building the antiquity of a world.
Long story short, fantasy and sci-fi's been a bit of a big transition for me, like a violinist picking up a Les Paul. But a lot of the tricks and skills I've learned are aiding me in my new literary ambitions.
Looking forward to any advice from all of you, and if anybody needs help world or history building, feel free to ask me.
I'm glad to help explain the actual mechanics on creating a ruthless theocracy or dysfunctional post-Information Age bumbling bureaucracy.
Gotta use that degree of mine for something besides a decoration.