:: was pastiche if that's what you are referring to.Weren't there Lensman Pastiches?![]()
Brian Herbert has forever cured me of wanting to read someone else's take on an author's creation.
Brian Herbert has forever cured me of wanting to read someone else's take on an author's creation.
Does The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen count as a pastiche?
It's a massive jumble of characters from other authors that have passed into the Public Domain.
It definitely is, but primarily as a satire. Which I'm in favor of.Does The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen count as a pastiche?
It's a massive jumble of characters from other authors that have passed into the Public Domain.
What do you not like for SF books?I read House Atreides. I thought it quite good.![]()
It definitely is, but primarily as a satire. Which I'm in favor of.
What do you not like for SF books?
For many of us that quite like Frank Herbert's writing and ideas, it was abundantly clear that Brian didn't understand the source material and could not emulate his father's prose or style, either.I happen to like House Atreides. Brian Herbert and Kevin J Anderson are both good writers
By Brian herbert you might want to check out Sydney's Comet
and by Kevin J Anderson The Martian War
As to what i like in science fiction or any genre for that matter. I like a good story.
For many of us that quite like Frank Herbert's writing and ideas, it was abundantly clear that Brian didn't understand the source material and could not emulate his father's prose or style, either.
It isn't. The main criteria is the other one I mentioned - he clearly doesn't understand the worldbuilding rules that Dune is constructed around.Emulating his style wasn't the point. If that's the main criteria for judging the worthiness of his Dune books . It's a poor one.
It isn't. The main criteria is the other one I mentioned - he clearly doesn't understand the worldbuilding rules that Dune is constructed around.
Enough for what? To make it universally acknowledged as great piece of pastiche literature, or for you to personally like the book? I'm not arguing that you don't or shouldn't like it, but if you want to argue about whether it does a disservice to the source material, you will find plenty of other people that feel like I do.I liked the story Brian Herbert and Kevin Anderson told and I liked the way did the characters. Isn't that enough ?![]()
Enough for what? To make it universally acknowledged as great piece of pastiche literature, or for you to personally like the book? I'm not arguing that you don't or shouldn't like it, but if you want to argue about whether it does a disservice to the source material, you will find plenty of other people that feel like I do.
To give a simple example, the world works the way it does in Dune because of a balance of technological developments that have forced humanity into a culdesac. But Brian ignores this and throws in some juicy laser gun battles, even though the point of world is that this type of warfare just isn't possible. Throw that out and the underlying logic of the Empire completely collapses and become non-nonsensical.
I always thought Brian Herbert totally misunderstood the Butlerian Jihad concept and thus backfilled by creating a woman who started the rebellion against machines.
Had he never read Erewhon?
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
C | Pick One Favorite Word - and a little bit why | Writing Discussion | 4 | |
![]() |
Sherlock Holmes Pastiches | Literary Fiction | 4 | |
![]() |
Favorite Brainstorming Techniques? | Writing Discussion | 23 | |
![]() |
Shadows over Baker Street and other Holmes pastiches | Book Discussion | 8 | |
![]() |
Worst Lovecraft Pastiches/"Mythos" Writing | H P Lovecraft | 39 |