I knew that it would be hard work for Amazon to make it's instant video service work, and that inevitably, it would start off with a mixed bag of titles. Presumably, they would become increasingly more diverse and a better selection would be offered.
However, many titles I originally put on my watchlist have since become paid-for only. Worst still, there barely appears to be any significant content that has been added to replace it.
The result is that Amazon Instant Video seems to be becoming nothing more than a token service, more interested in pushing paid-for viewing in front of a list of stock titles that you've likely already seen, else wouldn't want to see.
Perhaps Amazon is struggling with studio agreements, hence why it's pushing so hard on its own titles to try and justify an increasingly expensive Amazon Prime membership?
Is this all just in my imagination, though? Any other members with Amazon Instant Video find it's working for them?
However, many titles I originally put on my watchlist have since become paid-for only. Worst still, there barely appears to be any significant content that has been added to replace it.
The result is that Amazon Instant Video seems to be becoming nothing more than a token service, more interested in pushing paid-for viewing in front of a list of stock titles that you've likely already seen, else wouldn't want to see.
Perhaps Amazon is struggling with studio agreements, hence why it's pushing so hard on its own titles to try and justify an increasingly expensive Amazon Prime membership?
Is this all just in my imagination, though? Any other members with Amazon Instant Video find it's working for them?