Interzone 256

Anthony G Williams

Greybeard
Joined
Apr 18, 2007
Messages
1,225
Location
UK
An interesting editorial in the British SFF magazine this week, criticising the current sensitivity about spoilers. The focus is on films (the author reviews these for the magazine) with the point being made that the pleasures of watching a movie include far more aspects than any particular plot twist. Indeed, if viewers like a film they will eagerly watch it again and again, regardless of the loss of any surprise. I am reminded of the famous scene in Raiders of the Lost Ark when Indiana Jones, facing yet another combat challenge from an enthusiastically sword-wielding enemy, just looks wearily at him – then pulls out a revolver and shoots him. I have read that the element of the unexpected makes this the most popular scene in the film, yet even though everyone knows what is about to happen, it still brings cheers and laughter when it appears.

I would argue that much the same applies to book reviews. Certainly there are some circumstances in which a spoiler really can ruin enjoyment (most obviously, to know WhoDidIt in a WhoDunIt) but the flow of events, the characterisation, the quality of the writing, all remain to be discovered whatever the reviewer may reveal. Having said that, some books are harder than others to review without spoilers, particularly those which include a significant plot twist part-way through; to avoid all spoilers would require ignoring everything from that twist onwards.

In writing my reviews for this blog, I do outline the plot for the sake of those readers who want to know what the book or film is all about. In doing so I try not to reveal crucial plot developments wherever possible but, when I really have no option, I split my posts into an initial spoiler-free assessment, with the full review separated from it by spoiler warnings. The example which comes to mind where this particularly applied was The Palace of Eternity by Bob Shaw, which heads off in a radically different direction part-way through. I hope that is satisfactory, but please let me know if you disagree (or agree, come to that!).

A new columnist who appears to have a regular slot in Interzone is author Nina Allan, whose stories occasionally appear in the magazine (my favourite being The Silver Wind, in issue 233). She has a different complaint, concerning supposedly SF books in which the SF element is merely a background rather than an essential part of the story. The specific example she gives is The Girl in the Road by Monica Byrne, a novel set in the near future. Allan praises the quality of the writing, the story-telling, and the richness of the imagined world, and says she enjoyed reading it. But she confesses to disappointment overall, because "the story could have taken place anywhere, at any time". That complaint struck a chord with me, as I have commented on a number of occasions on this blog about stories which are not obviously science-fictional. As Allan says: "When faced with the unfamiliar, the reader's first instinct is to ask why: why is this story taking place on another planet, in the future, in an alternate reality? Why didn't they just set it down the road from where they live? Does the science fiction matter, and if it doesn't, why is it there? If the reader feels bound to ask this question, then so should the writer." Wise words for all aspiring – and established – SFF writers to bear in mind.

While on the subject of Interzone columnists, I should mention Jonathan McCalmont's regular Future Interrupted column, in which in this issue he discusses the importance of ambiguity in stories and the value of surprise twists (assuming that a reviewer hasn't revealed them, of course!). To keep surprising readers as they grow more experienced and sophisticated, authors have to work harder to be inventive. He makes the following interesting comment: "The reason they say that the golden age of science fiction is twelve is that twelve-year-olds are sophisticated enough to comprehend most texts yet naïve enough to be surprised by nearly all of them." An interesting topic for discussion!

The author interview this time is with Ann Leckie, author of Ancillary Justice (reviewed here on 2nd August last year) and its sequel Ancillary Sword (currently in my reading pile). The review of the sequel, which incorporates a comparison with the original, is interesting since it sounds rather different in approach, so I may have to accelerate that one up my priority order, if it can find its way past all of the others....

Other book reviews did not prompt me to add any more to my "must buy" list (I am becoming increasingly selective, given the way my reading pile keeps growing faster than I can shorten it). The film and DVD reviews are as entertaining and informative as usual, although thanks to my recent efforts to actually travel to a real cinema to watch films in their natural habitat, I have already seen some of the ones featured here.

An interesting addition to the usual contents is an interview with artist Wayne Haag, who has worked on many films as well as providing covers for Interzone over the past year. Some insights into a normally obscure corner of the film industry.

Now to the short stories, of which there are just five this time.

Nostalgia by Bonnie Jo Stufflebeam, illustrated by Richard Wagner. Dysfunctional people in a future dystopia, trapped by their drug addiction in an apparently endless cycle.

An Advanced Guide to Successful Price-Fixing in Extra-Terrestrial Betting Markets by T. R. Napper, illustrated by Warwick Fraser-Coombe. The hero of this one is a not entirely sane gambling addict who follows obsessive little rituals such as varying the treads of the stairs which he steps on, imagining that alien gamblers are placing bets on which he chooses. Until reality crashes into his imaginary world to dire effect, forcing him into drastic action to save the day. A likeable story, filled with wry humour.

The Ferry Man by Pandora Hope, illustrated by Ben Baldwin. For ninety percent of the story this appears to be a non-genre tale about the grief of a recently widowed old man who turns to an unusual therapist for comfort, but the ending veers off into mythological fantasy.

Tribute by Christien Gholson, illustrated by Richard Wagner. A glimpse of an incomprehensible world in which a more or less normal human culture – apart from a predilection for sacrificing children to their god, that is – coexists with what seems to be one of the "gods", who doesn't have a clue what is going on.

Fish on Friday by Neil Williamson. A short story which consists entirely of one side of a telephone conversation, in which an earnest minion of an independent Scottish state tries to persuade a recalcitrant elderly woman to eat more fish, along the way revealing some of the bizarre priorities of the ultimate "nanny state".

I frequently complain about the downbeat mood of stories published in Interzone, so must raise a cheer that there are no fewer than two amusing stories in this issue. No surprise that they are my favourites by a wide margin. Williamson's tale is a little gem, using the comic possibilities of only hearing one side of a phone conversation to good effect, as the reader enjoys imagining the other side. Napper's story reminded me of the kind of really good tale that used to appear in anthologies decades ago when a neat story structure, dry humour and a satisfying ending were far more common ingredients of SFF than is the case today. More like these, please!

(An extract from my SFF blog: http://sciencefictionfantasy.blogspot.co.uk/)
 

Silver Owl

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2014
Messages
106
Hi I've never read Interzone before in my life but I thought I'd start with the 2015 issues and read them. I really enjoyed this though. My fave story was the one by T.R napper.
 
Top