Worst book covers

And the only mystery here is how this publication lasted thirty-one issues.

Is it possible because they spill the beans on what the mystery is on the front cover. Hardly makes it a mystery any more. Perhaps they should have called it 'House of the very quickly known' ?

Not keen on the fashion either, sort of Robin Hood Leprechaun.

Having taken the pee a little at them for that, I am now intrigued by what the 'uncanny creatures of Carl Griffin!' are. See that's a real mystery...
 
Is it possible because they spill the beans on what the mystery is on the front cover. Hardly makes it a mystery any more. Perhaps they should have called it 'House of the very quickly known' ?

Not keen on the fashion either, sort of Robin Hood Leprechaun.

Having taken the pee a little at them for that, I am now intrigued by what the 'uncanny creatures of Carl Griffin!' are. See that's a real mystery...

Building the suspense and then blowing the secret before the reader even has a chance to crack open the cover is always your assurance of quality writing.

And as far as fashion sense goes, can you really trust anyone who dresses like a Keebler elf?

Now, for the first time on the worldwide web, see the dark mystery surrounding Carl Griffin's Uncanny Creatures exposed in my reply to HareBrain's post . . . .
 
There was quite storm about that new cover, Pedo/Porno. Did they withdraw it yet? I think certainly in poor taste. Innocent child that I am, I didn't know who Clare Quilty was. The reference is probably apt, even though Clare Quilty was not a book cover designer.
 
There was quite storm about that new cover, Pedo/Porno. Did they withdraw it yet? I think certainly in poor taste. Innocent child that I am, I didn't know who Clare Quilty was. The reference is probably apt, even though Clare Quilty was not a book cover designer.

Nothing quite like introducing a bit of the inappropriate or the tacky and trashy to help boost the sales of a hoary old classic, eh?

By the way, Clare Quilty is a fictional character in Vladimir Nabokov's novel, Lolita. In the book he was a child pornographer, a revolting creep of the lowest order.
 
Aye, that cover is bloody dodgy.

Some reckon it was done to try and get coverage for a book which everyone's already heard about. In that sense, it certainly worked.
 
I came across this. Seems appropriate here:
B3m4-rsIQAAzpGV.jpg
 
Wow. Just. Wow. That may take the prize. Can't Donner and Blitzen there help old St. Nick out by spearing Mr. Yeti with their antlers? Cuz it's the killer kandy kanes that I think are the most amazing aspect of that generally amazing bit of... whatever. Though Prancer howling at the moon like a reinwolf is puzzling. And the text is of a piece with the painting. And...

I came across this. Seems appropriate here:

Is there anywhere else it would be appropriate? :D
 
Just when I thought Santa Versus the Martians and Silent Night, Deadly Night were the final words on tasteless pop culture ephemera, this comes along . . . . So, why not pull out all the stops and show the Yeti munching on a terrified elf too? Besides, all that white in the composition needs a little punching up with geysers of bright, oxygenated blood. And speaking of a lack of red, it's pretty obvious the Yeti isn't dying of blood loss, in spite of all candy canes he's been stabbed with. Far more likely, he'll be expiring from insulin shock.
 
See this one below - How was any of this ever allowed to be "OK" ??? Was the extra swastika in the top right really necessary? Who is this art directed at?

RuxWoVy.jpg
 

Similar threads


Back
Top