1. A community of fans, aspiring writers, and published novelists, we are the world's largest - and friendliest! - science fiction and fantasy forums.

    Registration is free, and we regularly give away free books and DVDs.

    So why not join now and meet people with similar interests and tastes in books, movies, and TV?

    Log in with Facebook

    Log in with Twitter

    Dismiss Notice


Discussion in 'Larry Niven' started by borups, Dec 30, 2011.


    borups New Member

    Dec 30, 2011
    Can someone please explain the cultural and political structure of the Fithp?

    Mirannan Well-Known Member

    Jan 20, 2013
    I'm new here, but I'll take a stab at it. The Fithp are obligate herbivores, with a herd mentality much like that of large Earth herbivores such as horses and buffalo. (Although they look somewhat like elephants, their social structure isn't much like that of elephants. For one thing, males are part of it.)

    Most herd animals have evolved a surrender reflex; part of the reason is that combat between large animals with natural weapons for dominance is risky for both. If the dominance relations are essentially settled, then combat is less likely and at least one of them is more likely to have offspring.

    The political structure is essentially "herds writ large" - presumably with sub-herds forming when the population gets big enough.

    Compare and contrast humans, who don't have significant natural weapons and are also evolved from creatures (somewhat similar to modern-day chimps) which don't either. As a result, our dominance relationships have always been more fluid because we could afford to fight. Of course, that advantage went south when we developed weapons - but our instincts have not evolved so far yet, perhaps.

Share This Page