yeah if they try and cut one or another part of that they will regret it cuz the story would not make much sense then.Originally posted by ray gower
I think the loss of Tom Bombadil and the adventures upto Bree is a great shame, but probably not a great loss to the overall film.
LOTR is not a simple novel- it is an epic of three 200K word volumes- Each volume is more than twice the size of an average novel. Something had to give. The fun comes in trimming the Two Towers. There is much less to lose.
Originally posted by Skip
I think the same. Sad as it is, they weren't central. There is going to be a right old butcher job in TT if they take ANYthing out really. But IMHO
But did they say TT would be longer?
Originally posted by Asmiley
Ah so you too have seen the excellent movie that is LOTR part one? Excellent isn't it? I'm going to see it for a third time this weekend.
Having caught the BBC's radio version today, it reminded me how truncated the film was in Moria.Originally posted by Shaun
I really hope Gimli gets a bigger part in the next two movies, as he was one of my favourite ( he's in my top ten from the books ). Atleast he had some good parts in "The Mines of Moria".