April 2018 reading thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
The long Way to a small angry Planet by Becky Chambers was indeed just as good as the first impression. Great storytelling, very personable characters - really a "feelgood comfort book". Something seldom found in SF. Loved it and already have the follow-up on my list.

I read this in great anticipation having picked up the good vibes online and I have to say I was disappointed. Not a bad novel as such, just very ordinary and I could not see what the fuss was about.
 
The long Way to a small angry Planet by Becky Chambers was indeed just as good as the first impression. Great storytelling, very personable characters - really a "feelgood comfort book". Something seldom found in SF. Loved it and already have the follow-up on my list.
I love that book. A hopeful, positive sf story. The second book is very different: darker in parts, but equally brilliant. I'm eagerly waiting for the third one, due around July, I think.
 
I love that book. A hopeful, positive sf story. The second book is very different: darker in parts, but equally brilliant. I'm eagerly waiting for the third one, due around July, I think.

I did really enjoy both books as well. The stakes might not be as high as in most space opera, but I felt it was still a compelling story.
 
I did really enjoy both books as well. The stakes might not be as high as in most space opera, but I felt it was still a compelling story.
I'd agree. These are stories about people. There may not be epic space battles*, but people surviving and making do can make, as you say, a compelling story. This is social sci-fi/space opera.

*Not a space battle, but the second novel is--in part--about escape from slavery. That's pretty high personal stakes. It's just not 'action-packed', as there's little violence, and it's methodically planned.
 
Have almost finished reading the snow queen by Joan d. Vinge, which I am really enjoying, and then on to Kushiel's Dart.
 
Well, I’ve just finished the Silmarillion. My curiosity got to me while following the “Re-reading the LOTR” thread and this was further galvanised by the kind encouragement/warnings of several members.

To be honest, for quite a while reading was with gritted teeth as my grasshopper mind struggled with the style/content, and though I looked at every page, retention was distinctly limited. However, as time went by, something started to come alive in me. By the end I was truly grateful I had made the effort, and my perspective on the LOTR now seems significantly different. I was also very interested in the 1951 Tolkien letter included in the introduction. For instance “….yet always I had the sense of recording what was already ‘there’, somewhere: not of ‘inventing’ ” really resonated in me. It looks like there is much for me to digest and much to read further. For the moment I am pleasantly reading through David Day’s Tolkien Bestiary, as it makes a lot more sense now. All in good time.

I also read Milton Shulman’s “Rally Round the Flag, Boys!”: a timewarp from 1958 not recommended except for sociological research. I read it because the adolescent in me remains fond of his “Sleep Till Noon”.
 
Last edited:
Jonathan Ames, You Were Never Really Here

An impulse buy, I bought this noir novella and dug in almost immediately.

The story concerns Joe, who works on an off-book operation, his specialty being to rescue young women from sex slavery. He's hired by a New York state senator to find his daughter and return her; the senator says a local mob boss has kidnapped her to control him. Almost from the beginning it goes wrong and Joe has to tap into the determination of his Marine past, and the experience from his years in the FBI to survive, figure out why his mission went wrong and determine what to do from there.

This is a solid story, well-written and thought out. It has the noir sense of despair but there's also an implicit path to a sort of redemption.


Randy M.
 
I read this in great anticipation having picked up the good vibes online and I have to say I was disappointed. Not a bad novel as such, just very ordinary and I could not see what the fuss was about.

It didn't really do it for me either, nice to see I'm not the only one because other people seem to love it.
 
Ring around the Sun, Clifford D. Simak

Simak hasn't ever really disappointed and given this is a bit of a classic of his, I expect I'll inhale it in short order. More comments to come on the CDS Rediscovery Thread, as per.
 
I spent much of the month getting through The Resurrectionist by James Bradley, as despite its being a relatively short book (only 333 pages, with many very short chapters and lots of empty space as a result) I had little enthusiasm for it. Anyone reading the blurb on the back and expecting a Gothic-horror potboiler dealing with Burke & Hare-type resurrection men in early C19th London, as I was, is likely to be disappointed. That is its initial setting, for the main character begins the book apprenticed to an anatomist who requires a supply of illicitly acquired dead bodies in order to provide specimens for his lectures. But that main character, one of life's voyeurs, is dull, weak, colourless, and the novel, which is written in first person, is frankly the same; the MC becomes addicted to opium and it's as if the book is written with the same deadening effect on the faculties. Far from being an exciting semi-adventure story, it's about the MC resurrecting himself (literally as well as metaphorically climbing up from the pit), but by the time this takes place I couldn't have cared less what happened to him, and the last 70 pages were baffling and turgid by turns, with most of the almost-interesting characters we'd seen in the first four-fifths of the novel left far behind. It's not badly written by any means, but that's actually also a problem, as it's very much Good Writing, with Themes and Ideas and Literary Devices and the author's heavy-handed manipulation of fate a la Thomas Hardy takes away all agency from its characters. Someone in the mood for a (definitely capitalised) Literary Novel might get more out of it than I did, though.

A claustrophobic and heart-pounding experience last week, of ascending a narrow open spiral staircase through the middle of a bell chamber in a church tower, just as the church clock deafeningly chimed the quarter hour, inevitably led my thoughts to The Nine Tailors by Dorothy L Sayers, in which bells and their brooding presence play a key role in both the plot and its denouement. One of her Lord Peter Wimsey books, it's perhaps not as smoothly written as some of her others, and there's a bit too much info-dumping about change-ringing for my taste, but reading it again for the umpteenth time still had me glued to the page.

Finally, to accompany the new TV series, I've started a re-read of a book which has links to both the above, a literary novel which is genuinely of the C19th (but rather more sensationalist than the Bradley), while also being one of the first detective/crime novels: The Woman in White by Wilkie Collins.
 
The Woman in White by Wilkie Collins

I once played the male lead in an adaptation for stage, and I remember it as a dreadful play - all my character did was gush melodramatically with the heroine, before everything was suddenly and conveniently resolved off-stage. It really made me realize that interesting characters solve their own problems. I can only hope the novel is better for you. :)
 
I actually read it about 5 years ago and -- making all necessary allowances for the verbose Victoriana -- actually enjoyed it a good deal. It's actually quite pacy for its day, and has a corker of a female character who is brave, forthright, loyal and intelligent. Of course, though, since she's identified with all the masculine virtues, she can't be the MC's beloved, who has to be weak, insipid and borderline feeble-minded. :rolleyes:

The BBC adaptation is taking a few liberties with the story to make it more palatable for modern tastes -- the comic Italian friend is now not comic but larger than life; Hartright is a real artist, not merely a drawing master; Laura Fairlie has been given a personality transplant (though for some reason they've got her permanently dressed in what looks like a nightie :confused:) -- and there's rather too much unnecessary scene-setting so we don't forget it's Victorian drama. It's not at all bad, though, and it emphasises the detective drama issue by putting the lawyer front and centre as he takes down evidence of what has happened. Worth having a look at it on iPlayer to see if their version is better than the one you played in!
 
Finished listening to "Exhume" by Danielle Gerard and moved on to the next in the series "Excise." I like these mysteries because the main character (Dr. Schwartzman) is both vulnerable and determined. Makes for an interesting dynamic. I'm also reading "Flicker" by Rebecca Rode. A S.F. book which leans heavily into the IMO Fantasy realm of mind "reading" and mental "warfare." But I'm enjoying it so far.
 
I've got four on the go this month
  • Brewer's Dictionary of Myth and Fable - I'm up to S.
  • The Eng. Lit. Kit by Diggory Tweedcroft - a bit of light reading. Supposedly does for literature what 1066 and All That did for history.
  • Plot & Structure by James Scott Bell - expect some outstanding 75 and 300 worders from me in the future ;)
  • Deluge by Sydney Fowler-Wright - even though it was written in 1927 it still resonates today
 
Tales of Majipoor by Robert Silverberg. I've never actually read the series, picked it up from a library book sale because I recognised the author. Serviceable well written stories but got the feeling I'm not getting the full "story" out of each one.

Napoleons Wars by Charles Esdaile. Someone reserved this at the library so it was away from me for a while and I'm finding it tough to pick it back up again.
 
I've been trying to work my way through "A Scanner Darkly" by Philip K. Dick, but I can't get into it because I find it boring. I have enjoyed several of his short stories, but the pacing of this novel is too slow.

Didn't enjoy it too much myself. Read it right after I finished Neal Stephenson's exceptional Snow Crash and struck me as rather unimaginative, not unlike the rough draft to a first novel.

I haven't read A Scanner Darkly. I did just read Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep after watching Bladerunner 2049 (not good) & rewatching the original. It was surprisingly average, very much what I think of to myself as "mid century American sci-fi". The writing itself is competent, if workmanlike, the characters feel dated and artificial, and the whole thing was very clearly a vehicle for capital "I" Ideas. Some of which are interesting, others bizarre, like this meditation on empathy (a major theme)....

"Empathy, he once had decided, must be limited to herbivores or anyhow omnivores who could depart from a meat diet. Because, ultimately, the empathic gift blurred the boundaries between hunter and victim, between the successful and the defeated."

It did do a lot to fill in background worldbuilding for Bladerunner, questions like "What's up with all these artificial animals?"

In general, I liked the book, but I prefer the film.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top