Thanks, Curt.

And thank you for the recommendation of the book
Chopin's Funeral, I'll definitely get it with my next book order. Being a big Chopin lover I've read a couple of run-of-the-mill Chopin biography and can't wait to read a good one! Oh I got that Polish film's name terribly wrong. It's
Chopin: Desire for Love.

I'm surprised to find it on amazon:
Amazon.com: Chopin: Desire For Love: DVD: Adamczyk,Stenka,Woronosicz.
About
The Red Voilin, you sumed it up perfectly. What you said "
at it's heart's centre is a deeply personal tragedy that sets the whole story in motion" and "
it has a literary depth and richness usually found only in films that have adapted a book to the screen" are so true! It's a shame that such a brilliant masterpiece is terribly underrated (back to the culture issue). There are other two wonderful non-Hollywood classical music related films I love:
Shine (isn't Geofrrey Rush brilliant!) and Roman Polansky's
The Pianist. Have you seen
Amadeus? I totally dislike it. Mozart was featured like a little clown with an American teenager's accent. But the movie won the Oscar somehow. The only credit as far as I can see is for the superb performence of Murray Abraham as Antonio Salieri - if you ignor the historic fact that Antonio was not an evil but a great musician who taught Beethoven, Liszt, Schubert and even Mozart's son.
Now, where were we? Oh the bookstore - digression is a guity pleasure.

Well, though there will never be a bookstore of our dream, at least we have the internet, as you said.
Merry Xmas!
How did I miss this post? Many apologies Allegra!
I agree with you about
The Pianist and
Shine. Although I can certainly understand and respect your objections to
Amadeus I must admit to liking the film. Author Peter Shaffer was less concerned with historical accuracy than he was in using the legendary rivalry between Salieri and Mozart as a springboard for examining the nature of jealousy and the artist's relationship to his society.
Let's face it: watching the act of creation - no matter how sublime or thrilling the end product - is about as electrifying as watching mould grow on a baseboard. So, the dramatist waltzes in and gingers things up a tad with fictional doses of sex, intrigue and violence to make these confections more palatable to the greater viewing public. No matter how far these turgid little soap opera melodramas stray from the facts (and here I felt that
Immortal Beloved was truly offensive to the memory of Beethoven) they always assume that pandering to the lowest common denominator must be a given. They have no faith in the natural conflicts found within an artist's life being substantial or compelling enough to support a drama.
What sets
Amadeus above the rank-and-file biopic is its story arc, witty dialogue and it's profound underlying thesis concerning the divine justice of bestowing great gifts upon one (perhaps morally undeserving?) man whilst denying many (more virtuous?) others who desire and would appreciate them far more.
We can't forget that no matter how briliant Mozart was as a composer he was also a
man - and a flawed one at that. Mozart was a lively, vulgar, but playful man. He loved pranks and jokes of all types, possessed a strong ego because he knew his worth as a composer, had a powerful sex drive that ocassionally spilled over outside the boundary of his marriage to Konstanze, loved drinking and making merry with his fellow court musicians (who, we shouldn't forget, were at that time considered social inferiors, of a stature not much higher than a groomsman or valet). Here the filmmakers were representing Mozart and his milieu accurately - even as they alienated his diehard fans the world over. What many fans - in their need to cannonize and defend him from the cheapjack exploiters - is that his playful, child-like personality is the wellspring from which his music draws its fresh, effervescent, eternally youthful qualities that still delight audiences more than 200 years after his death.
On the other hand the darker side is, of course, his innumerable scatological wordplays and references. His letters to his sister Nanerl are chock-full of these. What his fixation on rectal functions tells us about his nature is probably best left to the clinical psychologists. That the filmmakers chose to focus on his more puerile traits to the exclusion of others informs us that they were possibly playing up to the egalitarainism of the public . . . . however historically accurate or well it supported the basic premise of the film in the first place.
As far as Antonio Salieri goes, he's certainly received the the worst bum rap in the history of the arts. You're right in saying that he was a great teacher and a good, highly respected composer - if not at the level of some of his more esteemed pupils like Beethoven and Schubert.
Here's hoping that this post finds you and yours in great health and in even better spirits for the upcoming New Year!