Talysia
Lady of Autumn
I voted unsure, because there are so many possibilities of what it could be. I'd like to think that there's more to it than just a myth, though.
So far as I understand it, Plato stated what was in effect a second-hand morality story from the ancient world - yet somehow his very limited account has been turned into a science fiction story of epic proportions, without actually validating itself in anyway.
If you're looking for the story as a metaphor, then places such as what is the Scilly Isles or Minoa - or even Santorini itself - all fulfill the story in different levels.
The version of Atlantic we get nowadays seems completely divorced from the ancient realities mentioned, though. For example, claims that an ancient Greek talking about a society being "advanced" as somehow implying greater technological development than societies in existence 2,500 years later (ie, the modern world) is simply bollox. If there was ever a nuclear-powered Atlantis then Plato wouldn't never have spoken about a civilisation across the seas, but instead of mighty gods on earth.
The whole concept is to ancient history what Nessie is to zoology - it's a marketed gimmick that is fed entirely by imagination and helps sell things. Perhaps more seriously, it's a piece of ancient folklore mis-read as literal, and turned into the product of contemporary imagination, nothing more.
As for being able to justify itself - well, Eric Von Daniken's works can seem extremely well argued - until you start using third party information.
But that's just my opinion, and I'm a cynic, I guess.
Yeah but, McMurphy - I think I read somewhere that archaeologists have said they have evidence that the Biblical Flood did happen. Whereas, do we have any evidence relating to Atlantis?I think there is a chance it existed in the same sense that the Biblical World Flooding has some grounds in history due to some immense regional flooding around the same time as the appropiate scripture. There could have been, once, a land mass which had been populated that had descending into the ocean. Perhaps both unrelated examples could be seen akin to a treat of truth covered with a healthy amount of the chocolate that, in these cases, would be mythology.
Yeah but, McMurphy - I think I read somewhere that archaeologists have said they have evidence that the Biblical Flood did happen. Whereas, do we have any evidence relating to Atlantis?
I've been researching a new novel I intend on writing and have found the most excellent source for the case of Atlantis as a real part of Earth's history. In THE DESTRUCTION OF ATLANTIS, the author Frank Joseph has accumulated an astounding wealth of evidence that Atlantis at one time did indeed exist. Although he uses the 900 instead of 9000 years ago theory, which he explains along the way why, this book is an eye-opener!
All the information is perfectly cross referenced, comes from the four corners of the earth, and makes for a very, very convincing case. By far, it's the best book I've read on the city of Atlantis. Anyone wanting to learn about this ancient culture that disappeared beneath the waves should without a doubt get this book as well as it's companion book, SURVIVORS OF ATLANTIS -Their impact on world culture. Both books are absolutely convincing.
I have to say that I believe that Atlantis existed and still exists in some form.
Generally, myths have some basis in reality and we have evidence for a number of cities that have subsided into the ocean. For example, part of Greek Alexandria fell into the ocean, and you can still find evidence of habitation under the water. It is true that over time the myth has been embellished time and again, with the addition of technology and various abilties attributed to the Atlanteans, but this happens with most mythology.
I am sure that in time the issue will be resolved as long as we can strip down the myth to its bare bones and work on theories. I think it may involve tectonic shifts which led to an earthquake in which the place known to us as Atlantis sank.
I remember reading that too, I think it was somewhere in Mesopotamia, around the time of Gilgamesh, and that the accounts in Genesis, Popol Vuh and Critias are all of the same flood.I think I read somewhere that archaeologists have said they have evidence that the Biblical Flood did happen. Whereas, do we have any evidence relating to Atlantis?
Really? Y-chromosome and mtDNA studies have found evidence for a very small population size in the post-Ice Age period. They have found that the Ice age forced the human populations to migrate and cluster into smaller isolated communities, areas described as genetic refuges. In Europe, these refuges were concentrated in three areas: The Basque country between France and Spain, the Balkans and the Ukraine. When the ice retreated the survivors remaining on the European landmass began to expand north wards. With such a low population level anyway, I can't see how a sea-level rise would destroy civilizations. The sea-level rise would not be a catastrophic event either, such as that described in Genesis, Popol Vuh and Critias. It would happen more slowly over a long period of time, and the people would move with it.There is very little doubt that the flood myths derive from the melting of the vast glaciers at the end of the last Ice Age. Many civilizations were destroyed by these floods, particularly those by the (then) seaside when sea levels rose sharply around 10,000BC.
That's not myth, it's solid fact.