April 2019: Reading Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Am reading Home by Francis Pryor, a book about the lives of people in Britain through different prehistoric periods, and some of the massive changes to archaeological approaches over the past few decades. And, ohh, it's wonderful - it really brings the people of the past alive. Even better, he doesn't patronize or diminish them, plus he can use his own insights as a farmer to contribute to the archaeology - which means he's not afraid to speculate, which is refreshing. :)
 
I was leant this book but haven’t got round to reading it yet. I’m really enjoying a history book at the moment so it may be time to move onto this next. Good to read your opinion.
 
I have started a reread of Tad Williams’ Memory, Sorrow, and Thorn. I read it so long ago, it may as well be a first read as I recall very little of the plot. Part of my reason to pick these up again is because of the continuation of the Osten Ard books with the new releases (The Last King of Osten Ard).
Sword and sorcery quests were what I cut my fantasy teeth on, and this is a classic example. While I have moved on to prefer ‘grimdark’, there’s something nostalgic and hopeful about the young boy who grows into a hero.
 
Grevel Lindop: “Charles Williams, the Third Inkling”
I thought this a truly excellent biography. All credit is due Grevel Lindop: this must have been very much a labour of love as Williams is not exactly well-known and large sales must have been an unlikely prospect. It is helped by access to many of his letters that show an intimate side of a kind that is not usually available to biographers.

When the book arrived I was a little put off by its size, but once I began reading I soon found that I was really enjoying both Williams’ depth of perspective into the human/spiritual condition and also his decidedly unusual quirks (I won't go into his means of accessing the creative muse), to the extent that I read just a few pages a day to spin it out. I thought when I first read about him in Carpenter’s “Inklings” that I wish I’d been able to hear him lecture, as I got a sense there of his capacity to enthrall an audience and take them along with him to new heights of perception of whatever was being discussed, and this biography bears this out the more so. He seems to have had a remarkable capacity to enable others to feel good about themselves – (witness just one example, W.H.Auden’s recollection: “For the first time in my life I felt myself in the presence of personal sanctity. I had met many good people before who made me feel ashamed of my own shortcomings, but in the presence of this man – we never discussed anything but literary business – I did not feel ashamed. I felt transformed into a person who was incapable of doing or thinking anything base or unloving. I later discovered that he had a similar effect on many people.”) - and to look at life, literature and the spiritual through fresh eyes.

Williams operated through the perspective of Christianity, and I am hardly versed in Christianity, but this seemed kind of irrelevant to me in my reading, as his take on Christianity always appears to go to the heart of the spiritual rather than to a particular creed. For example one practice that was very significant for him was that of taking on others’ distress through prayer, which seems very similar to the Tibetan practice of “tong-lin”, though Williams could not have known of this.
There is also extensive discussion of Williams’ poetry, and while this went pretty much over my head, I could still get some sort of appreciative sense of it, perhaps because Grevel Lindop is, I believe, a poet himself.
For those looking for details on the Inklings, and Tolkien in particular, they only appear towards the end of the book and there is not a lot of information on them. However I was pleased to read this description of Warnie, C.S.Lewis’ brother, “….W.H.Lewis, a man who stays in my mind as the most courteous I have ever met – not with a mere politeness, but with a genial, self-forgetful considerateness that was as instinctive to him as breathing”, because in my limited reading Warnie usually seems to be given a poor deal by commentators due to his use of/ problems with alcohol. Likewise I could see ample evidence that Tolkien very much enjoyed and valued Williams’ company in those Inkling years despite the oft-reported jaundiced comment he made in later life, "nothing to say to each other at deeper (or higher) levels", (which may well have been affected by having learned in the meantime of some of Williams' "quirks").

I’ve really enjoyed this, and before starting it I’d read nothing of his published work.
 
Last edited:
Great review, @Hugh. I've just ordered it from the library,
I'll be interested to hear what you think. I'm not really sure why I appreciate it so much. It may well be the sense of intimacy.
 
Last edited:
Hugh, I forget -- have you read John Wain's account of Williams and Lewis in his early autobiography Sprightly Running? It's worth borrowing if you haven't. But if you're not going to read the whole book (the Lewis-Williams material is not more than ten pages or so), don't miss the material about E. H. W. Meyerstein, an eccentric character of serious faults, whom Wain loved. (Btw Wain's biography of Samuel Johnson is excellent.)

Grevel Lindop's biography of Thomas de Quincey is very good, too. But I agree about his Williams biography. I got it from the library, but after reading it bought a copy.
 
Hugh, I forget -- have you read John Wain's account of Williams and Lewis in his early autobiography Sprightly Running? It's worth borrowing if you haven't. But if you're not going to read the whole book (the Lewis-Williams material is not more than ten pages or so), don't miss the material about E. H. W. Meyerstein, an eccentric character of serious faults, whom Wain loved. (Btw Wain's biography of Samuel Johnson is excellent.)

Many thanks as ever. I'd read of this book, but hadn't considered reading it because of the limited material on the Inklings.

Clearly a visit to the library next week...
 
The book I'm spending the most time reading right now is Andrew Delbanco's The War Before the War: Fugitive Slaves and the Struggle for America's Soul from the Revolution to the Civil War. It seems to me a fine book, blemished by the author's frequent indulgence in references to current controversies. Whether one agrees with him or not about the analogies, these become a bit of a flaw in that they start the reader off on trains of thought that take him or her away from the book, or else require the reader to dismiss them. They will probably make the book seem dated very quickly. If you were reading a 1973 book about, say, the Virginian colonists and the Native people, and the author kept referring to the controversy of the 1960s-70s about the Vietnam war or the Tellico Dam project, you'd probably wish the author had reigned that in.* Similarly, I suspect that readers of Delbanco's book in years to come may wish he'd omitted so much about our time in his very readable account of the antebellum United States. It also becomes a bit irksome that the athor seems to sort of flatter himself and the majority of his readers in that the modern instances to which he refers are all predictable ones -- so there's a bit of virtue-signaling. But don't let these blemishes keep you from the book if you think you'd be interested.

*Or that the author had worked out the point about analogy more thoroughly, perhaps in optional end-of-book notes or in a concluding chapter.
 
Last edited:
Started re reading The Hunchback of Notre Dame, and saw this bit of info today on Notre-Dame booksellers urge donations, I had no idea the book helped to save the great Cathedral at the time:

Literary critics argue that Hugo's main motivation for writing the book was to draw attention to the then-dilapidated cathedral and the value of the Gothic architecture.

Prior to the publication of Hugo's book, sections of Notre-Dame cathedral had fallen into disrepair.

He began writing the story, also known as "Our Lady of Paris", in 1829, using the building as the backdrop for his dramatic tale.

At the time, parts of it lay in ruins, having sustained serious damage during the French Revolution.

Hugo's enormously popular novel - set in Notre-Dame's heyday in the 1400s - is partly credited with saving it.
 
I just finished reading Shadows Linger book two in Annals of the Black Company in an endeavor to read through the works of Glenn Cook. Ever since I discovered Steven Erikson and his Malazan Book of the Fallen series I have been enamored with the genre of military fantasy, and have sought out those books which have served inspiration for Erikson. This book proved quite good, and while not as sweepingly epic as that which the Malazan series strove for, I still enjoyed the read a great deal. Now I'm starting on the sequel, The White Rose.
 
I have started a reread of Tad Williams’ Memory, Sorrow, and Thorn. I read it so long ago, it may as well be a first read as I recall very little of the plot . . . While I have moved on to prefer ‘grimdark’, there’s something nostalgic and hopeful about the young boy who grows into a hero.

I think you may find that the story is darker than you remember, especially the final book in the trilogy.
 
I think you may find that the story is darker than you remember, especially the final book in the trilogy.
Ahh, ok. So far it has been a rather straightforward journey.
I bemoan my unreliable memory, but sometimes it gives me gifts like many 'new' books to read. :sneaky:
 
Yes, that happens to me (increasingly as I age). I'll read a book I know I've read before but the plot and characters seem completely unfamiliar. This series gets darker as it progresses and the stakes get higher.
 
Am reading Home by Francis Pryor, a book about the lives of people in Britain through different prehistoric periods, and some of the massive changes to archaeological approaches over the past few decades. And, ohh, it's wonderful - it really brings the people of the past alive. Even better, he doesn't patronize or diminish them, plus he can use his own insights as a farmer to contribute to the archaeology - which means he's not afraid to speculate, which is refreshing. :)
Sounds really good - I keep meaning to read some stuff by Pryor, but, you know, TBR pile..
 
Reading Calcutta by Christoper Moorhouse. Heading there for work in a couple of weeks so I thought I should do some prep.
By crikey, anyone who wants some world-building ideas for their next sf or fantasy novel should read this.
 
Hitmouse, do you mean Geoffrey Moorhouse? His Calcutta book should be absorbing. I think well of his Sahara book, The Fearful Void.
51689
 
Hitmouse, do you mean Geoffrey Moorhouse? His Calcutta book should be absorbing. I think well of his Sahara book, The Fearful Void.
View attachment 51689
Yes, Geoffrey, nor Christopher. Thanks for the correction.

I am impressed by the quality of his writing. Engaging yet sober. Lets the subject speak for itself.
 
I got a duology by Al Robertson to read over the Easter Weekend.
Both of his cyberpunk noir books set on the massive Station orbiting an abandoned Earth.

Crashing Heaven and Waking Hell.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top