Thanks Ian, an interesting comparison is Scarfy on this forum. He's sold on average 1200 books per month on Kindle for the last 5 months. I think at £1.99 he earns £1.20 per book. If his sales hit 15,000, which they look like doing for the year. That'll earn him 18K before tax which is much more than the traditional route.
That is *exactly* what I'm thinking about.
Self-published used to be entirely about vanity press, and I've repeatedly argued that if you have a strong manuscript good enough for traditional print publishing, you should go that way, and treat it as a business.
However, if you really do have a strong manuscript, and feel you can successfully market itself, then as a business decision self-publishing for Kindle makes more sense.
I was in Waterstones the other day, and looked at the authors present in the sff section. Some names were not present, and other names had only a limited selection.
Which means the only way those missing books will sell is via the internet.
And if the internet is the main sales platform for those books, then surely the authors may as well control that process themselves?
I firmly believe what we're looking at with epublishing is a massive revolution and once the Kindle Fire comes to the UK, we'll see this really entrench in the public consciousness - that books can easily be read on iPad/tablet/Kindle.
So if a publisher is not able to put your books on book shop shelves, and only gives you a small percentage of sales income from internet sales, then surely - with a solid marketing plan - it makes more sense to sell directly yourself?