Oxygen Generation on Mars

I don't think you actually need that much oxygen for people, unless you want their living quarters to be hundreds of times larger than the ship they came in. And that's because you can recycle the oxygen from the CO2 and H2O that our bodies make.

But oxygen for combustion is priceless if you going to keep using chemical rockets.
According to this article, Can taking carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and splitting it into carbon and oxygen help stem the tide of rising greenhouse gases?, in separating Oxygen from CO2, you end up with Oxygen and Carbon Monoxide. Also the process apparently requires very high temperatures which would, classically, require burning more carbon based fuels to get the resulting oxygen. That doesn't mean that we can't find a way to do it more efficiently, but until then, it looks like splitting H2O may be the only workable solution. (NASA, I think, just scrubs CO2 out of the air to make it breathable, using lithium hydroxide as a sorbant. Of course they also haul along extra oxygen. US Navy submarines use soda lime as a CO2 scrubbing sorbant but also have a different process than NASA, using seawater. In both cases - it looks like we have to have a supply of disposable sorbant material.)

All of this assumes we're trying to create breathable air for an underground (or otherwise enclosed) habitat. If the question is focused on how to provide Mars with an atmosphere, that seems orders of magnitude more complex and probably a problem to address several generations after living in tunnels. In between these two extremes, underground farms seem the best way to scrub CO2 and generate oxygen. See current work on vertical and aerobic farming (especially Fischer Farms in the UK.)
 
Or you could do it with something like algae, since the chlorophyll cycle separates and releases O2 with sunlight.
 
Mars' core is still molten. This was determined when a large meteorite hit Mars and the sensors on various pieces of equipment picked up the resulting echoes allowing scientists to get a three dimensional view of the core. The Earth's core is explored the same way, by disturbances in the crust like earthquakes.

One theory has it that when a very large meteorite hit Mars it knocked the core so bad that the dynamo got extinguished. Once that happened the solar wind removed the air and water from the surface of Mars.

Restarting the core dynamo is something that can only be solved by science fiction at this time. Finding people who are willing to go to Mars is not a problem, but getting them to Mars is a big problem.

If most of the open space was below ground and the surface areas were all domed then eventually it would be become a large open space that could have a atmosphere. There are plenty of chemicals on the surface to provide chemical and electrical energy as well as using solar energy. Water in the form of dusty ice is being found in increasing amounts. It can be used for water, broken down into oxygen and hydrogen which can be used for air and fuel. Fuel cells use hydrogen and oxygen for fuel.

Mars get less sunlight but its atmosphere being thinner absorbs less sunlight than Earth's does. When the winds blow the thick dust makes solar power useless, but since there is wind, wind turbines could be used to get electricity. There is a lot of wind activity at night. The turbine blades would have to be huge to make up for the thinner atmosphere. They might also need to be very resistant to get ground away by the dust in extreme wind storms. Or the blades could be covered up during bad dust storms.

As one article points out, there won't be any big settlements on Mars, or the Moon, until the battery situation is fixed. The current batteries need a lot of improvement and maybe complete overhauls before they can be used on Mars or the Moon.

There is talk of using mini reactors as power sources on the Moon and Mars. It's hoped that this can be a practical idea before 2030. Getting them to Mars or the Moon would be somewhat of a problem, but once set up they would solve a lot of problems. With a nuclear source there would be less pressure to have super batteries in place.

There are nuclear powered batteries which probes use. They have radioactive material in them that gives off heat as it emits radiation. The electricity comes from thermal power converters which convert heat energy to electricity. Its a highly developed product, around since the 1950s. There is a plutonium battery that is used to power a pacemaker. The idea being that the battery will never need replacing.

Maybe this is the planet of the Apes. A space probe gets launched from future Earth that goes back in time through some space anomaly and comes back down to Earth in the distant past, landing in a big ape populated area. The radioactive battery breaks open and spreads traces of potent radiation around which the apes get exposed to after making a monument out of it. They lose hair, bones thin out, neurological changes rewires the brain, and soon there are people running around wondering how did I get here?.

This was a fear that some people had when the almost famous Jupiter probe, Galileo Orbiter, attempted to crash land on the surface of Jupiter with all the sensors sending back everything they could before they got crushed by the pressure. It was powered by a series of small radioisotope thermoelectric generators, though the press described it as a large plutonium battery. It never reached the surface.
 
The more this is discussed, the less I see the attraction to Mars. No atmospheric or magnetic protection, but just enough atmosphere to make solar not work. Not a big source of minerals, damaging sandstorms, huge transit distance from earth. It's like we're holding on to 19th century ideals.

The moon seems like a goldmine in comparison.
 
The most annoying thing about this topic (to me), is that we always do stuff like this by the skin of our teeth. No one ever suggests sending 200 rockets up to build a large ship that could travel to Mars comfortably. We have conditioned ourselves to think of exploration as some cash-strapped endeavor that must be performed with a vow of poverty and crew selected for the ability to withstand terrible circumstance and little care for old age.

What a glory space would be right now if we had built several Orion's in the early '60s.
 
Most space craft are 100% oxygen, but at a low pressure.

Vitamins will also be needed feed to crops and soil. If you want something like a sustainable ecosystem, you need enough of those elements for all the plants and fauna.
Used to be. For the US spacecraft, 100% oxygen was replaced by a mix of Helium and Oxygen after the Apollo 1 fire that burned Grissom and company alive back in 1967.

My father was a Helium plant manager for the Bureau of Mines. Shipments for NASA increased tremendously after 1967. At the height of the Space Shuttle's activities, they (Helium Activity) would ship 20 million cubic feet, that's 20 railcars, per flight. Helium was also used to pressurize the fuel tanks eliminating the need for pumps.
 
Used to be. For the US spacecraft, 100% oxygen was replaced by a mix of Helium and Oxygen after the Apollo 1 fire that burned Grissom and company alive back in 1967.

My father was a Helium plant manager for the Bureau of Mines. Shipments for NASA increased tremendously after 1967. At the height of the Space Shuttle's activities, they (Helium Activity) would ship 20 million cubic feet, that's 20 railcars, per flight. Helium was also used to pressurize the fuel tanks eliminating the need for pumps.
I don't think that's correct:

People breathing heliox have high pitched voices.
 

Similar threads


Back
Top