The thread title is slightly misleading, in that I'm only really referring to two fusion approaches out of the four (I think) currently being pursued.
The four are tokamak, laser ignition, Polywell and focus fusion. Of the four, the first two are characterised by the probability that they will work only in enormous units; the latter two rather the reverse.
And that's relevant to what I'm here to start a discussion about - energy security. One of the potential problems with today's industrial civilisation is its reliance on electricity, and the fact that the electricity distribution network is vulnerable to various sorts of disruption.
The disruption can be caused by various factors. One is the weather; particularly in the USA, where huge areas are served by power lines that are above ground, extreme weather often brings down the lines and leaves people without power for weeks. And another, far more potentially dangerous, one is space weather, in other words the vagaries of the Sun.
A large CME that actually hits us has the potential to destroy the grid over continent-sized areas in such a way that it would take years to fix. The weak points are the transformers; the reason it would happen is that EMP events such as this are made much worse by having long conductors (such as transmission lines!) exposed to them.
The availability of power generation in relatively small (suitable for a few dozen houses, or an apartment building for example) units would mean much greater energy security, because the grid wouldn't be needed - or, at the very least, could be done without in extremis.
Go!
The four are tokamak, laser ignition, Polywell and focus fusion. Of the four, the first two are characterised by the probability that they will work only in enormous units; the latter two rather the reverse.
And that's relevant to what I'm here to start a discussion about - energy security. One of the potential problems with today's industrial civilisation is its reliance on electricity, and the fact that the electricity distribution network is vulnerable to various sorts of disruption.
The disruption can be caused by various factors. One is the weather; particularly in the USA, where huge areas are served by power lines that are above ground, extreme weather often brings down the lines and leaves people without power for weeks. And another, far more potentially dangerous, one is space weather, in other words the vagaries of the Sun.
A large CME that actually hits us has the potential to destroy the grid over continent-sized areas in such a way that it would take years to fix. The weak points are the transformers; the reason it would happen is that EMP events such as this are made much worse by having long conductors (such as transmission lines!) exposed to them.
The availability of power generation in relatively small (suitable for a few dozen houses, or an apartment building for example) units would mean much greater energy security, because the grid wouldn't be needed - or, at the very least, could be done without in extremis.
Go!