Boaz
Happy Easter!
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2005
- Messages
- 6,549
thad, I cannot disagree that he faced debacles and destruction in the face on a number of occassions. But somehow he avoided disastrous defeat in the field time after time. Call it luck. Call it fate. Chalk it up to inept enemies. Mark it down as intelligence. Call it whatever... Somehow he was either victorious or escaped in every battle.
Maybe it was the literary heritage of Rome that allowed Caesar to win. He learned the lessons of war from written history. Did the Gauls, Britons, or Germans have books of military history? No. But Caesar had read of Horatio at the Sublican Bridge and knew that you can retreat to fight another day. He'd read about Fabian and he knew how defeat saps national will. He'd also read about Marius and he knew the value of siegeworks. He knew about Cincinnatus and seizing the initiative. Scipio Africanus. Sulla. He'd also read the military histories of Macedonia, Carthage, Sparta, Thebes, Athens, the Persian Empire and more.
In the end, I'd say Caesar's greatest quality was that he commited himself to his craft. He hardly went halfway, if ever.
Maybe it was the literary heritage of Rome that allowed Caesar to win. He learned the lessons of war from written history. Did the Gauls, Britons, or Germans have books of military history? No. But Caesar had read of Horatio at the Sublican Bridge and knew that you can retreat to fight another day. He'd read about Fabian and he knew how defeat saps national will. He'd also read about Marius and he knew the value of siegeworks. He knew about Cincinnatus and seizing the initiative. Scipio Africanus. Sulla. He'd also read the military histories of Macedonia, Carthage, Sparta, Thebes, Athens, the Persian Empire and more.
In the end, I'd say Caesar's greatest quality was that he commited himself to his craft. He hardly went halfway, if ever.