Ra...an Asgard?

Discussion in 'Stargate - the movie' started by ColonelFlip, Oct 25, 2005.

  1.  
    ColonelFlip

    ColonelFlip New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2005
    Messages:
    3
    So heres the deal....I'm watching the movie again the other night and I start to think. What if Ra was actually a rogue Asgard who alligned himself with the Gou'uld? I know it's one of the continuity errors between show and movie. But it makes sense to me.

    He would be able to declare himself more powerful than the rest of the system lords. Therefore, he would take the highest position. He would have already had knowledge of the StarGate and how it worked. Then he would just transfer his essense into the host.

    What'ja think? I'll elaborate more if we get some coversation going.
  2.  
    PTeppic

    PTeppic Reetou Diplomatic Corp

    Joined:
    May 31, 2001
    Messages:
    3,862
    Or even "worse", a Goa'uld who has taken an Asgard as host...
  3.  
    darkghost

    darkghost the unaverage joe

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2005
    Messages:
    50
    would make sense. in the film before the bomb explodes in his face his face turns that white colour and you see what was the real form of raa so mabye the boy was a cover like a cloaking shield to disguise himself.:alienooh:
  4.  
    PTeppic

    PTeppic Reetou Diplomatic Corp

    Joined:
    May 31, 2001
    Messages:
    3,862
    The dialogue in the film says that Ra took the inquisitive local Egyptian boys body for his own... doesn't sound like a "shield"...
  5.  
    darkghost

    darkghost the unaverage joe

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2005
    Messages:
    50
    good point i will have to watch the film again to see but you have to admit when the white light came from his face he looked more asgard than human or goa'uld. when you think about it more info on raa might clear this up mabye a book or comic. i doubt they would do more episodes of sg1 on raa than the 2 at the end of season 8:alienooh:
  6.  
    PTeppic

    PTeppic Reetou Diplomatic Corp

    Joined:
    May 31, 2001
    Messages:
    3,862
  7.  
    darkghost

    darkghost the unaverage joe

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2005
    Messages:
    50
    if raa is an asgard it must be a ancient asgard maybe a goa'uld in a asgard in a human. strange but could be possible:alienooh:
  8.  
    Dave

    Dave Wherever I Am, I'm There Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2001
    Messages:
    14,152
    I don't think Ra needs to be a partly ascended Goa'uld-Asgard. I think you are complicating things unnecessarily.

    I don't see why a Goa'uld-Asgard isn't possible if Unas, Humans and partly ascended Humans can be hosts, but if so, that begs the question of why Ra was the only one?

    I think that a Goa'uld-Asgard would be a very powerful being, and Ra was certainly something different to the other System Lords, being the 'Supreme System Lord'.

    Maybe the Asgard did something to prevent it ever happening again. It stands to reason that they wouldn't wish to discuss it. I always wondered why they never took the Goa'uld threat as seriously as they did the Replicators.

    I also realise that this is really just a discrepancy between the film and TV series, the film tends to suggest that Ra was of the species that built the Gates, when we now know that is not the case, but in the interests of Canon and continuity it should be addessed.

    Ra being a Goa'uld-Asgard does not completely explain everything about him though, but maybe his transference into the boy's body could be to do with the Asgard conciousness transference that happens when Asgard clones wear out.

    'Last of a dying race'... harder to reconcile that. The Asgard were in trouble at one point in the series due to the cloning, but Ra could hardly be the last Asgard.
  9.  
    Writers Blocked

    Writers Blocked New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    127
    I kinda like the idea of Ra being a link between the Goa'uld and Asgard. Maybe a few thousand years ago the Asgard were trying to use the DNA from these alien snakes with remarkable regenerative abilities to fix their problems. If they felt somehow responsible for the Goa'uld menace, it would explain their almost parental policing of them.
  10.  
    Delvo

    Delvo New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2006
    Messages:
    452
    It's just one of the things about the movie that they changed to make the show. They're two separate presentations in two separate "fictional universes". The Goa'uld in the movie (if they even got named in the movie) looked like that. The Goa'uld in the show don't. It's not the only thing they changed going from movie to series, and it's not the only movie franchise to do so either. (Think of Highlander & Terminator.)
  11.  
    dekket

    dekket New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Messages:
    295
    The Stargate Wiki entry on Ra (Ra - Stargate Wiki) states that:

    However, as it is not referenced, I don't know how accurate it is.
  12.  
    PTeppic

    PTeppic Reetou Diplomatic Corp

    Joined:
    May 31, 2001
    Messages:
    3,862
    About the only references on the net trace back to the Wiki page, so it seems to be the source, rather than vice-versa.
  13.  
    Humaren

    Humaren New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2008
    Messages:
    17
    Thats the worst thing about wiki everyone can add or subtract to it and turn things into what they want.

    We can conjecture all we want, but the simple fact is that Delvo is right no RA connection between movie and show. We started off in one Stargate universe and Gated to another and settled in.

    Myself...I like the way it worked out.
  14.  
    PTeppic

    PTeppic Reetou Diplomatic Corp

    Joined:
    May 31, 2001
    Messages:
    3,862
    Precisely.

    Some things are easily explained: the name of "the mineral" (naquadah), the name of the servants (Jaffa) and the pyramid ships (ha'tak, albeit with slight design changes). "Children of the Gods" even covered a number of explicit differences (the use of the non-"MacGuyvered" dialing device [DHD] on Abydos [which now has a name] and of course the larval symbiotes within Jaffa [thus leading to those within Goa'uld [who of course now have a species name]). Apart from the spelling of O'Neil(l)'s name, and that of his son, the appearance of Ra during the explosion is probably the single biggest difference between the movie and the series...
  15.  
    Delvo

    Delvo New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2006
    Messages:
    452
    Another is that the Jaffa staff weapons had another feature that the TV show never used. A strike with the fishtail end was enhanced with some sort of energy burst to make it as if the target had been hit significantly harder than it was. (I don't know whether there was a visual effect for this, but I know there was a sound effect.) I don't know why the TV show skipped that feature but kept the fishtail.
Similar Threads: Raan Asgard
Forum Title Date
Stargate Atlantis Season 1 Tok'ra and/or asgard Aug 20, 2003
Stargate Aliens Asgard Physical Combat Jun 12, 2003
Stargate General Discussions Asgard ship specs and pics anywhere? Nov 27, 2002
AusGate's Stargate Command asgard city Jun 13, 2002
Stargate General Discussions Revealed Mystery of the asgard Jun 12, 2002

Share This Page