LHC Already Beginning to Rule Out Higgs Bosun?

Tell officer Higgs that his job is secure; the LHC has no authority to fire him. But advise him that any sub-atomic particles should be turned in before leaving port.
 
IMHO, a lot of very technical bets have just been lost.

Still, they've apparently excluded the least Higgs' from the mid-range. It's either a bit higher or lower on the energy scale.

Nature's version of 'Hunt the Thimble'...

What happens when the elusive Higgs' runs out of hiding places within reach is going to be expensive...
 
A Higgs boson walks into a church.

"You can't come in here," the priest says. "You're only a sub-atomic particle."

"You have to let me in," the particle says. "Without me, you have no Mass."
 
Nik said:
IMHO, a lot of very technical bets have just been lost.

Still, they've apparently excluded the least Higgs' from the mid-range. It's either a bit higher or lower on the energy scale.

Nature's version of 'Hunt the Thimble'...

What happens when the elusive Higgs' runs out of hiding places within reach is going to be expensive...
Click to expand...

Not necessarily; a year or so back when they were just about getting to turn the LHC on, a number of scientists said that not finding the Higgs could be the most interesting result, requiring a lot of re-thinking and, in their terms, a lot of exciting new thinking to be done.
 
Vertigo said:
Not necessarily; a year or so back when they were just about getting to turn the LHC on, a number of scientists said that not finding the Higgs could be the most interesting result, requiring a lot of re-thinking and, in their terms, a lot of exciting new thinking to be done.
Click to expand...

I don't think they're going to find it :)
 
For anyone interested in the on-going search for the Higgs Boson particle there was an Interview by Jim al-Kahlili with Tejinder Virdee this morning on BBC Radio 4. You can download the podcast here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/podcasts/series/tls

Although the interview series mainly focuses on the 'scientific life' of its guests, there was inevitably some discussion of their current work.

Tejinder Virdee is the lead scientist on the CMS particle detector at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. He stated (as I have seen elsewhere) that they should have a definitive answer on the Higgs Boson by December this year. He still seems moderately confident that they will find it.

One interesting bit was his description of the CMS detector as essentially a 100 megapixel 3D camera that takes 40 million images every second. How's that for high speed photography!
 
Here's a good link to the LHC:

http://www.interactions.org/cms/?pid=1030987

You open on the page and then go to the bottom and select the link you want: ATLAS, CMS etc, then click 'status'.

Or click back to the 'interactions' homepage.

All the details on a daily basis. Very scientific, but some is slightly understandable.

It shows the LHC's offline till 6th April.
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-18702455

They're not saying it is the Higgs boson (yet) but just something very very like it. It will take more time to be certain. On the radio this morning they said that scientists at the LHC are 99.9997% (I may have missed or added a 9 in there but it is about as good as you get with these things) certain that they have found a new particle.

Although this needs to be studied further it does seem to display all the characteristics expected of the Higgs Boson in the Standard Model. The problem is that some other theories also predict a particle with very similar characteristics to the Higgs boson which this could conceivably be. However the buzz (and celebrations) at the LHC is that they are pretty sure they have got the Higgs boson.

Finally...maybe...
 
If Higgs is responsible for mass, isn't it a little odd that it's so hard to find? Y'know, like "dark matter" making up most of the universe, yet it has never been found. Of course, the spooky theories that require these things couldn't be wrong...
 
Well I haven't been following all the ins- and outs- but,

1) I'm glad they've finally found something of note that resembles a Higgs boson (justifies that 10 Bn Euro we spent on the the LHC :))
2) Fingers crossed they find something about it that all the standard models say isn't right - 'cause then we will get pressure to change the models we've been using the past 40 years, which could be an extremely exciting time.
 
Well from what they have been saying they seem pretty confident that it does match the standard models. They also went on to say they expect a whole raft of new particles to be found now on the back of the knowledge gained from this. So I think it will still be pretty exciting either way!
 
Yes I agree, Vertigo. I've just got that itch for something a little bit unusual, just to make it a challenge for everyone to rethink everything anew. (or some new understanding that can in 10 years make a stargate to another star!!!)

On a related note. I do wish they would stop calling it the 'God particle'.

Might be good journalistic patter but I really can't see why it's god-like.
 
From my understanding, no one really even knows what the Higgs is. Kinda like dark matter.
 
Venusian Broon said:
Yes I agree, Vertigo. I've just got that itch for something a little bit unusual, just to make it a challenge for everyone to rethink everything anew. (or some new understanding that can in 10 years make a stargate to another star!!!)

On a related note. I do wish they would stop calling it the 'God particle'.

Might be good journalistic patter but I really can't see why it's god-like.
Click to expand...

Agree with the God Particle bit. And have to say it would be fun if it turned out to blow everything apart instead of unify it. SF writers would all be on the edge of their seats.

Shane Enochs said:
From my understanding, no one really even knows what the Higgs is. Kinda like dark matter.
Click to expand...
I thought they had a pretty good idea of its properties (or I should still say its supposed properties). Since it is a predicted particle and without knowing its properties surely they couldn't even be able to begin to look for it.
 
Vertigo said:
I thought they had a pretty good idea of its properties (or I should still say its supposed properties). Since it is a predicted particle and without knowing its properties surely they couldn't even be able to begin to look for it.
Click to expand...

Precisely Vertigo, the reason they've found what they've found is because they know more or less where to look for it. (Or at least the best places for it.) It's a wild, wild universe out there, and actually with the LHC you could look in all sorts of places.

As for it being dark matter (IF DARK MATTER ACTUALLY EXISTS*), the Higgs is the proposed mechanism for giving all particles mass, so it's not a biggy on that particular cosmological front!


* Sorry for shouting that, I do feel that dark matter is a bit of fudge that needs serious experimental evidence that so far hasn't really come through.
 
As far as I understand it, they have found a new particle and they think it is the Higgs-Boson but they are not certain yet that it is.
I can't imagine a new discovery blowing everything apart, it might add to it, it might even lead to a new theory that sits on-top of the current theories and gives more accuracy at certain levels/times but it won't make Newton or Einstien wrong.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
M Will learning a new language interfere with the ones you already speak? Science & Nature 17
D Can publisher edit books that are already published, without the authors permission? Publishing 9
Guttersnipe Oh No, Someone's Already Thought of It! Writing Discussion 27
B Yes, we've seen that before , someone's already done that first and better Book Discussion 10
W Does Analog accept stories that have already been epublished? Magazines 2

Similar threads


Back
Top